Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Miscellaneous > Formula Offroad
Loading

Notices

Thread: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2012, 01:07 PM   #21
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern,WV
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
The more I think about it, the more I want to do it. I'm thinking something like this would do the trick----------> Thunder Tiger CORP. -- RedLine.100Â*Engine forÂ*Helicopter NO.9611
Yeah that'll do the trick for sure...

Quote:
Originally Posted by demonoid369 View Post
^so how do you really feel? kinda seems like your yelling it with the bold letters lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
He's just really excited about it.
Oh and about how I was typing before...This isn't bold.It's just larger......THIS IS BOLD!!!!LOL
T I N Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-18-2012, 02:17 PM   #22
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Nearly 4 H.P. would be nice. Overkill, but nice. I'm not sure how everything else would hold up.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 11:54 AM   #23
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 640
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Why not. Remove the thought of a .21 size engine and go for a .40 "+" I had an out rigger boat (25 years ago) clocked at 65 MPH with a stock k/b marine motor running a oval. Not a straight line. I know there is not a lot of machinist out that what to do this. But comparing a R8 Tekin to a .21. There is no replacement for displacement. LOL

Europe has a nitro foff class. but then they have a number of people running multipule .21s on a pulling tractor. I think the boys across the great pond like it. Imagine tuning that and getting it running. The sound is awesome.

Evan
SlickRockSpider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2012, 03:09 PM   #24
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tekin, ID
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickRockSpider View Post
There is no replacement for displacement.
Have to disagree on that one, electric 1/8 scales can make a ton more torque than any nitro engine you could ever dream of fitting in it. An electric FOFF vehicle is going to have many advantages over a nitro. Not saying a nitro one wouldn't be cool, but it won't be making any more power/torque than an electric.
Ty@Tekin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 09:37 AM   #25
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 640
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ty@Tekin View Post
Have to disagree on that one, electric 1/8 scales can make a ton more torque than any nitro engine you could ever dream of fitting in it. An electric FOFF vehicle is going to have many advantages over a nitro. Not saying a nitro one wouldn't be cool, but it won't be making any more power/torque than an electric.
Hi Ty

I did not bring up Tekin R8 as a negative. I love electric motors. I love all means to make HP.


Keep in mind title does not mention 1/8 scale. Nor did I.


As for "There is no replacement for displacement"

The term comes from 1 to 1 engines. Like a 350 ci engine makes said HP. The a 454 cid will make more. The saying is 50 years old. So a big motor makes more HP. Even with electric motors.


Ty I have a question for you. I seems that I have to really dig or not find this info at all. So what gives. If you could show me where I can get this kind of info from Tekin that would be awesome.

Specifications

Stator Diameter28.0 mm (1.10 in)
Stator Thickness30.0 mm (1.18 in)
No. of Stator Arms12
Magnet Poles4
Motor Wind1.5 Turn Delta
Motor Wire1 Strand 1.6mm
Motor Kv4650 RPM / Volt
No-Load Current (Io)2.43 Amps @ 8 volts
Motor Resistance (Rm)0.056 Ohms
Max Continuous Current56 Amps
Max Continuous Power420 Watts
Weight170 Grams (6.00 oz)
Outside Diameter29.0 mm (1.14 in)
Shaft Diameter4.00 mm (0.157 in)
Body Length74 mm (2.91 in)
Overall Shaft Length90.0 mm (3.54 in)
Max Lipo Cell2s
Motor Timing5-15deg
Drive Frequency8kHz
Max RPM42000 RPM




This is Tekins info for a R8

Weight: 4030: 11.5oz (341g) 4038: 14.25oz (404g)
Shaft Dimensions: 19 x 5mm w/flat
Motor Diameter: 1.57” (40mm) / 1.65” (42mm) including fin
Motor Length: 4030: 2.80” (71mm) 4038: 3.0” (76mm)
Bearing Dimensions: Front: 5x16x5mm / Rear 5x11x5mm


MOTORP/NTURNSVOLTAGEKVROTOR
Redline T8 2650 (B)TT23502D4S265018.5mm
Redline T8 2250 (T)TT23601Y4S225018.5mm
Redline T8 2050 (B)TT23512.5D4S205018.5mm
Redline T8 2000 (T)TT23612D4S200018.5mm
Redline T8 1900 (B)TT23521.5Y4S-5S190018.5mm
Redline T8 1700 (T)TT23622.5D4S-5S170018.5mm
Redline T8 1700 (TT23533D4S-5S170018.5mm
Redline T8 1550 (T)TT23631.5Y4S-6S155018.5mm
Redline T8 1400 (B)TT23542Y4S-6S140018.5mm
Redline T8 1350 (T)


TT23643D4S-6S135018.5mm


Most people don't need of want this info, but to compare motor to motor you need it.

Sorry about the hijack

Remember I am not bashing you or TEKIN. Tekin produces a great product.


Evan
SlickRockSpider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2012, 10:38 AM   #26
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ty@Tekin View Post
Have to disagree on that one, electric 1/8 scales can make a ton more torque than any nitro engine you could ever dream of fitting in it. An electric FOFF vehicle is going to have many advantages over a nitro. Not saying a nitro one wouldn't be cool, but it won't be making any more power/torque than an electric.

Cool factor is huge in this game!

I'm pretty sure a lot of people would change their mind if they saw a nearly 4 H.P. nitro snorting and snarling up a nasty climb at 30,000+ RPM throwing a huge roost from all four paddles. To me, that is cool vs. HOLY SH!T.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 08:32 AM   #27
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 640
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
Cool factor is huge in this game!

I'm pretty sure a lot of people would change their mind if they saw a nearly 4 H.P. nitro snorting and snarling up a nasty climb at 30,000+ RPM throwing a huge roost from all four paddles. To me, that is cool vs. HOLY SH!T.
I could not have said it better.


Evan
SlickRockSpider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 08:45 AM   #28
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tekin, ID
Posts: 1,940
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

To keep it simple, most people just need to know the kV rating of a motor so they can match up the proper battery. All that other info is confusing to most people that don't understand what they are looking at and it ends up with tons of phone calls and e-mails with them trying to figure out what they need, so we made it simple. From that list, I see we are missing, the stator info, winding wire size, current, resistance, max power, timing, wattage and drive frequency.

With the T8, since it has to go into cars that use opposite drive train rotation, the timing is fixed and is neutral to both rotation directions. Not really a needed spec, IMO. Drive frequency, well, that's all in the ESC and I'm not at liberty to give out that kind of information. Seriously, I'll probably get beaten by the Prez . Max current is always so over-hyped, on paper it can be worlds apart from real world conditions. I agree this is all good info, but for most of the people browsing motors it's too much and just causes confusion, especially for 1/8 scale. The real techy guys might want to know everything, but most want to match a motor to a battery and go race.

As for the 1/8 scale comment I made, I used that because it was a scenario of nitro vs. electric in equal conditions. The electric 1/8's can produce a lot more instant torque than a nitro engine can, that's just how brushless motors are. Sure, nitros are fast and have power and sound cool, but electric has the potential to blow it out of the water in terms of torque a horsepower. Don't get me wrong here, I'm a gearhead and I ride snowmobiles, dirtbikes, jetskis and love my 2/4 stroke engines. Been eyeing an electric dirtbike though, can't imagine the snap something like that has!
Ty@Tekin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 10:39 AM   #29
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 70
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

This thread is going a little sideways. It isn't a matter of electric vs. nitro. The question was why nobody seems to use nitro at all, fully recognizing the potential performance shortcomings vs. electric.

I think it would be damned cool. Just like the multi engine RC pullers are damned cool even if a single 1/8 brushless can pull the same or more weight. Nitro is more work, both to design and build and also to run and maintain. Having something unique could be worth it though in smiles per mile. Same with monster trucks - yeah my Savage 4.6 can't do standing backflips and the Flux has a tonne more power but, for that truck, I want fumes and smoke and noise. It just seems to be a proper fit.
Dukk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 10:56 AM   #30
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Arnold
Posts: 194
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

i agree with dukk i dont think this about nitro vs electric both of witch have pro's & con's so i think anyone with a nitro based foff should post pics & lets see them
usslandlocked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 01:52 PM   #31
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany
Posts: 640
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Thank you Ty for telling me as much as you could legally. I understand.



Evan

Last edited by SlickRockSpider; 09-28-2012 at 01:56 PM.
SlickRockSpider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:11 PM   #32
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Auburn, MI
Posts: 1,177
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Did everyone forget one major factor.
FOFF means climbing hills of gravel and sand.
That means you WILL get stuck.
Being able to blip the throttle in reverse and come back down the hill is key, unless you like to crawl up a 45 degree incline while your nitro car snuffs itself out.
In my opinion, Nitro limits what you can do with the car pratically.
Even with a cheap short course style motor and controller, and a 2s lipo, you can have a ton of fun..
bigstu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 02:17 PM   #33
Moderator
 
badhoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

i have an old xtm xfactor i've thought about making a foff out of. i know it wouldnt be as fast and reliable (or clean) as an electric, but there is definitely a charm to the sounds and smells of nitro that electric rigs will never have.

it was a pretty fun truck the one time i ran it before yanking the axles for a crawler,and it would benefit greatly with a much lower ride height and less suspension travel.
badhoopty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2012, 09:53 PM   #34
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukk View Post
This thread is going a little sideways.

It's cool. I like when it gets sideways.


I was driving my nitro FOFF style before it was ever called FOFF. Up hills steeper than 45 degrees at times, believe it or not. I loved it! However, my nitro is 2wd and doesn't get traction no matter where it is or what tires I have on it. That's where this idea was born.

The only downfall that came to my mind was the reverse thing, as mentioned above. But with that kind of power I should be able to baloon the tires like a top fuel dragster, and not get stuck.

Last edited by Dini; 09-28-2012 at 09:56 PM.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 01:29 AM   #35
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Any ideas on how to combat the reverse issue?
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:32 AM   #36
Moderator
 
badhoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
Any ideas on how to combat the reverse issue?
xtm xfactor trans has reverse, i would assume there has to be some other nitro rigs that have reverse as well.
badhoopty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:54 AM   #37
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rancho Relaxo. California. USA. Earth.
Posts: 3,292
Default

A lot of the nitro mt's had a reverse option. Hpi Savage, Losi lst and Associated mgt all come to mind. A popular mod was to do the FOC (forward only conversion). It lightened up the drivetrain tremendously for better spool up to overcome the centrifugal clutch systems. However the greater momentum of a heavier drivetrain could help for foffing perhaps?
Meatwad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 02:57 PM   #38
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern,WV
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatwad View Post
A lot of the nitro mt's had a reverse option. Hpi Savage, Losi lst and Associated mgt all come to mind. A popular mod was to do the FOC (forward only conversion). It lightened up the drivetrain tremendously for better spool up to overcome the centrifugal clutch systems. However the greater momentum of a heavier drivetrain could help for foffing perhaps?
I concur.....lol
T I N Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 01:27 PM   #39
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatwad View Post
A lot of the nitro mt's had a reverse option. Hpi Savage, Losi lst and Associated mgt all come to mind. A popular mod was to do the FOC (forward only conversion). It lightened up the drivetrain tremendously for better spool up to overcome the centrifugal clutch systems. However the greater momentum of a heavier drivetrain could help for foffing perhaps?

That's good info. Now, do any of those listed have a 3 speed tranny?
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2012, 05:53 PM   #40
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern,WV
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
That's good info. Now, do any of those listed have a 3 speed tranny?
I think the Savage has an aftermarket one.
T I N Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



FOFF: Why Not Nitro? - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nitro FOFF Nitro_Geezer_UK Formula Offroad 4 12-16-2011 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com