Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Miscellaneous > Formula Offroad
Loading

Notices

Thread: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2012, 02:33 AM   #1
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Ok, so I've watched some videos, and now I'm hooked. I am already thinking about what parts I need to build a nice foff in the future (after my crawler is built and tuned). Coming from a nitro backround, the question came to my mind as to why more people don't use nitro engines to power their foff rigs? I use to foff my nitro before it was called foff. I've even been told to f off a few times while running it. Any reason(s) for this? Yes nitro is loud, stinky and burns your eyes when running. But you can get great power to weight ratio with them, and you can run them all day without having to recharge your batteries. I would think nitro engines would work well due to the rpm range an foff rig seems to need to be successful.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-26-2012, 02:41 AM   #2
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gervais
Posts: 1,715
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

price of nitro is more than a few packs of lipos plus the electric motors have quick rpm as the nitro or more plus all the torque right off the bat. all around electric motors do better, not saying nitros cant but electric will be easier and better
demonoid369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:16 AM   #3
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 83
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

nitros engines are great, some motors are really really powerful ... but for the foff exigence ... i think that a good nitro setup vs. a good electric setup ... this last kill the first ....

there are some electric combo (esc - motor - batteries) that are really really killer !! high rpm, high torque at low rpm, high allround performance ... and if is necessary, if you want to do some water skipping, waterproof.
Heartless82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 09:24 AM   #4
I joined the Band!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,405
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

i had a tmaxx with a 2.8 big red 3.4hp motor.. while it was ok.. i was going to put paddles on it but then the noise.... the oil residue... my lack of being able to always keep it adjusted and running right...

now im back on electric... and going to build a FOFF...

im also doing what your doing..
starting to think what i need.. everyone told me to get my body first.. or know what body i want... the reason is then you can build the wheel base around it...

my foff is going to be a
beach foff / trail basher
so paddles / trail tires
im going to make my own frame...
use a summit 2 speed trans
brushless 6s system
allthread links

and WELCOME TO THE FOFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RootBreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 02:06 PM   #5
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 83
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

6s ;) ;)
Heartless82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 02:48 PM   #6
I joined the Band!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,405
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heartless82 View Post
6s ;) ;)
well 6s - 12s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




















that is



Eeeee F in F O F F
RootBreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 04:47 PM   #7
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rancho Relaxo. California. USA. Earth.
Posts: 3,292
Default

Nitro is old tech. Clutch shoes will never grab like a pinion and locked spur setup. Not to mention the instantaneous torque of electric. Internal combustion 2stroke engines require you're within a certain rpm power band determined by air intake, tuning, fuel, exhaust and etc. to put out decent torque. There's really no reason to run nitro anymore unless your aiming for that class or nostalgic reasons, there are more ticks in the con column of performance/runtime.
Meatwad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 04:52 PM   #8
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: thurmont
Posts: 732
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

i would think it would be easier to clean sand out of an electric motor than to clean it out of an engine
theloudone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 05:40 PM   #9
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 544
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

I run nitro 1/8 buggy, but thats only because its the biggest class at the local track. Otherwise i would run electric hands down. Instant power, cleaner, quieter, cleaner chassis layouts(personal opinion), no pitman for mains, doesn't die if the turn marshal doesn't get to it fast enough, etc. A nitro foff would have a cool factor to it that electric just cant have, but the cons just don't seem to wieghout to me.
Lukescb7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 06:03 PM   #10
I joined the Band!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lukescb7 View Post
I run nitro 1/8 buggy, but thats only because its the biggest class at the local track. Otherwise i would run electric hands down. Instant power, cleaner, quieter, cleaner chassis layouts(personal opinion), no pitman for mains, doesn't die if the turn marshal doesn't get to it fast enough, etc. A nitro foff would have a cool factor to it that electric just cant have, but the cons just don't seem to wieghout to me.

I envy u.. I would love to be skilled to tune nitro... I still like it
Sent from my Epic 4G Touch using Tapatalk
RootBreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:13 PM   #11
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 128
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

I think a high winding smaller displacement motor with an airplane fuel tank would make a ridiculous FOFF truck. Would be much more enjoyable than the instant torque of a brushless setup, IMO. Thanks for the idea, I may be stealing it.
Zeus.:God is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:01 PM   #12
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus.:God View Post
I think a high winding smaller displacement motor with an airplane fuel tank would make a ridiculous FOFF truck. Would be much more enjoyable than the instant torque of a brushless setup, IMO. Thanks for the idea, I may be stealing it.

I think something along those lines would be cool also. Just because it can be done. If I ever do it I will, of course, post pics.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 08:04 PM   #13
Nobody
 
Cordwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 966
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Did you guys check out Bart Benders rediculous nitro FOFF?

Girth wind and Fire FOFF
Cordwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 12:51 AM   #14
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Damn that thing is BADASS! That is sort of what I had in mind. Have you seen it in action?
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 02:31 AM   #15
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern,WV
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

IMO I would have a nitro FOFF as a second rig.Just for the "old school" feel,sound and look of it. Just think of it pulling up to the line revving. Smoke snorting out if the exhaust. The calm before the storm of the motor at idle.Then all hell breaks loose with sand spraying back, exhaust shooting out in a constant scream of "look at this shit" sound. I think it would be more of a challenge with the clutch engaging and disengaging as you throttle up and down while going up the track.Keeping it at a happy medium would be a challenge in itself.Because you wouldn't want it jerking from start to stop while trying to navigate the course.If I had a vote I'd say go for it.
T I N Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 02:55 AM   #16
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gervais
Posts: 1,715
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

^so how do you really feel? kinda seems like your yelling it with the bold letters lol
demonoid369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 03:24 AM   #17
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Southern,WV
Posts: 1,136
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

Quote:
Originally Posted by demonoid369 View Post
^so how do you really feel? kinda seems like your yelling it with the bold letters lol
Nope not yelling just have a large screen monitor. And the text gets to small to look at every once in a while is all. Sorry..
T I N Y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 10:02 AM   #18
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

He's just really excited about it.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 02:20 PM   #19
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gervais
Posts: 1,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dini View Post
He's just really excited about it.
demonoid369 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 12:19 AM   #20
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Portland
Posts: 156
Default Re: FOFF: Why Not Nitro?

The more I think about it, the more I want to do it. I'm thinking something like this would do the trick----------> http://www.tiger.com.tw/product/9611.html

Last edited by Dini; 09-11-2012 at 12:36 AM.
Dini is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



FOFF: Why Not Nitro? - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nitro FOFF Nitro_Geezer_UK Formula Offroad 4 12-16-2011 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com