|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-25-2015, 11:53 AM | #1 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Waltham
Posts: 707
| Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender?
This body would have been killer on an Ascender. 1968 Ford F-100 Pick Up Truck V100-S 1:10 RTR (VTR0302: Vaterra Has anyone shortened and Ascender down to a 256mm wheelbase? Any driveshaft binding? How long are the frame rails at the shortest wheelbase? |
Sponsored Links | |
06-25-2015, 12:31 PM | #2 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Corruptifornia
Posts: 12,107
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? Quote:
| |
06-26-2015, 04:08 PM | #3 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: SB
Posts: 556
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender?
I might get this truck, scale hydraulics ? |
06-26-2015, 04:46 PM | #4 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: bay area
Posts: 214
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? http://www.vaterrarc.com/Search/Defa...Term=Ford+body Says late July |
06-26-2015, 04:57 PM | #5 |
Sr. Product Developer Join Date: May 2005 Location: Fontana
Posts: 786
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? |
06-26-2015, 07:24 PM | #6 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2007 Location: Taylors Falls just hanging with the MNRCRC crew.
Posts: 7,843
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender?
It would be really nice as long as it isn't super sized. I had the opportunity to drive an Ascender (Blazer Body) recently and the scale of the body seemed a little oversized to me.
|
06-28-2015, 03:30 AM | #7 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Corruptifornia
Posts: 12,107
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? Quote:
I think the Blazer is pretty spot on, reminds me of the older Blazers stuffing 36s. | |
07-04-2015, 07:15 AM | #8 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 97
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender?
Alot of our local guys make their usual comments on the Blazer body, I luv it! it actually "Helps" thru a course! I run 1.55 class1 and it actually helps having the larger body, it guides rocks to the tires and the body helps for roll overs, when on my side full turn and bump the throttle, wam its back on all 4!!! I will run it until it falls apart!!!! |
07-04-2015, 07:33 AM | #9 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: New Brunswick,Canada
Posts: 1,425
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender?
If your not liking the Asender body how about this... NEW HPI Racing 79 Ford F-150 Supercab Clear Savage XL 105132 NIB Length: 21.2 (539mm) Wheelbase: 14.5 (368mm)x8.25 (209.5mm) Width: 7.25 (184mm) Height: 5.4 (138mm) Thickness: 0.040 (1mm) the only down fall is the width kinda narrow... Last edited by rustneversleeps; 07-04-2015 at 07:38 AM. |
07-07-2015, 09:52 AM | #10 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Corruptifornia
Posts: 12,107
| Re: Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? Quote:
Measurements: Body Length: 500mm Width: 225mm Height: 160mm Wheelbase: 12"~ Would be nice if there were more crawler bodies with detail like the Blazer. Last edited by Natedog; 07-07-2015 at 09:55 AM. | |
Why didn't they do this body for the Ascender? - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need help with new body on my Ascender | kcbeatty | Vaterra Ascender | 11 | 07-08-2015 06:05 PM |
Ascender Body Swaps | jrkilburn | Vaterra Ascender | 3 | 12-30-2014 06:16 PM |
| |