Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs General Tech > 1.9 Scale Rigs
Loading

Notices

Thread: brushless trophy truck project

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2007, 06:21 PM   #21
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: colchester
Posts: 496
Default

go with #2 looks better than the first one
xjwalt666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-23-2007, 06:30 PM   #22
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 264
Default

Go with the second it is way more scale looking on it.
joecrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 06:35 PM   #23
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shelby TWP, MI
Posts: 94
Default

if the first wasnt all hacked up I would say that one, but considering its not in very good shape, go with the second. Or like GulaVW69 said, rockwerks has some bodies that would look really good on it.
XxPr3miumRid3rxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 07:01 PM   #24
Release your anger..
 
ThinkTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North American Union
Posts: 1,063
Default

hey sniper i would redo the Aarms for something like this
and keep the ford it looks very Class 8ish

Last edited by ThinkTank; 06-08-2007 at 11:34 PM.
ThinkTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 07:16 PM   #25
Tig
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 120
Default

damn GT40, that Ranger is badass man.

I agree about the suspension set-up.

You know what would be a nice rear-end for this, a Kyosho Mad Force. You can cut it down to fit.

Tig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 07:24 PM   #26
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: East Valley
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GT40
hey sniper i would redo the Aarms for something like this
and keep the ford it looks very Class 8ish
That's what I had in mind , about the a-arms anyway.
86chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 07:27 PM   #27
Release your anger..
 
ThinkTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North American Union
Posts: 1,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tig
damn GT40, that Ranger is badass man.

I agree about the suspension set-up.

more links
http://www.esbfabrications.com/ryanranger.htm
http://www.off-roadweb.com/features/...cab_prerunner/
http://www.canddfabworks.com/My_Home...les/Page2.html
http://www.geiserbros.com/projects.htm
and check out the article archives at http://www.off-roadweb.com/
for more prerunners
ThinkTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 09:03 PM   #28
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Redondo Beach
Posts: 123
Default

I would also say the first body (but one that's in better condition). It looks like a Class 8 truck that I used to watch locally back in the day:
ctcballer26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 09:13 PM   #29
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
Posts: 421
Default

Always good to see the baja trucks
madhatter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 09:44 PM   #30
RCC Addict
 
sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: spotting for jeepsohigh
Posts: 1,154
Default

After looking at all those great trucks i think i'll throw mine in the trash!
does anyone have the diff diameter of a madforce axle i am worried about it being to big for the 1.9 tires i am using? Also if i use the first body i am buying a new one that one been hacked up on several different trucks.I am also thinking about reworknig front susp. but thats no easy task, all i have is bad skills not mad skills.
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:08 PM   #31
20K Club
 
Harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sending illegals home one Hayabusa at a time.
Posts: 22,981
Default

I like the second body quite a bit, have seen in on another prerunner on here. How well will those joints on your chassis hold up with some hard jumps and stuff?

Josh
Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:35 PM   #32
Release your anger..
 
ThinkTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North American Union
Posts: 1,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper
does anyone have the diff diameter of a madforce axle i am worried about it being to big for the 1.9 tires i am using?
heck, go for it!

[/quote].I am also thinking about reworknig front susp. but thats no easy task, all i have is bad skills not mad skills.[/quote]

Sniper ,if you want to you could use I-beams instead of Aarms for the front..
ThinkTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:46 PM   #33
RCC Addict
 
sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: spotting for jeepsohigh
Posts: 1,154
Default

nah its gotta have a arms. its gonna be another sleeepless night. i am making some rough drawings for some spindles now. thinking about scraping the frame but not sure yet
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 10:54 PM   #34
Release your anger..
 
ThinkTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North American Union
Posts: 1,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper
nah its gotta have a arms. its gonna be another sleeepless night. i am making some rough drawings for some spindles now. thinking about scraping the frame but not sure yet
i found some pictures on some spindles and a couple of frames and some more Aarms,

Last edited by ThinkTank; 06-08-2007 at 11:34 PM.
ThinkTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:10 PM   #35
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bellflower
Posts: 195
Default

i say go with body #1 for many reasons...(if you can get a new one)

#1 because it has an old school "rough-riders" paint job, with that body on it, it looks like a CORR pro-lite truck, and also, because the truck you are building wont have alot of suspensiopn travel, but will have alot of power, it would handle and drive like a pro-lite style truck. but thats just my opinion..

if you need any pics of back-halfs or suspension setups, let me know. i am very knowledgable in the faster field of off roading.
OORRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:27 PM   #36
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 50
Default

I've had plans to use that 2nd body in a project myself... wally-world rocks!

FYI.... that body is made of some cheap plastic. I already cracked it along the top of the bed. Don't expect much from it.
SantozRey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 03:27 PM   #37
Picky Fab'r/Acetal Junky
 
Offroader5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Arizona Desert/AJ
Posts: 3,073
Default

I was thinking of doing something like this. I wanted the suspension to work/function like the 1:1's and look as close as possible for scale reasons. I was going to concentrate on having a very low stance (like you seem to be mocking up for)...and have most of the suspension travel in droop, and then make some scale sized air bumps or something. That way when you jump it, the suspension would fall away and then compress back under the truck on the landing, just like the big boys.

FYI...I found that the Jato front arms are a good candidate because they are long and a larger scale so as to make them seem longer on a somewhat smaller scale rig. I think they are somewhere in the 4.5" to 5" long neighborhood. If you used those and only made a center section that was like a 1/2" wide...you'd end up with around 9.5" to 10" of width wheel nut to wheel nut. This is a perfect match if you use a rear Kyosho axle that is at 12" and can easily be made more narrow to 10" or 11".

Keep it up...I'll be watching this build
Offroader5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 06:27 PM   #38
RCC Addict
 
sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: spotting for jeepsohigh
Posts: 1,154
Default

Thanks everybody for all the great ideas and pics i think i have everything i need now. I am going to have to use the black body it looks like to get the arms longer the old school body is just too narrow i need a body a about 7.5 in. wide to get enough width to get some good wheel travel. I also scrapped the frame and am working on a new one ,I got a little ahead of my planning but the new one definetly should not dissapoint anyone ( someone will always say something ).
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 06:32 PM   #39
I joined the Band!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ...
Posts: 515
Default

let me tell you now. cleaning the welds with alum. rod is hell! i stared my "creepy replaca" and its so hard. ive tried a file but it doesnt do much. and a dremle, well..... it gets clogged. if you get it to wirl let me know. have fun.






























is your cage alum.?
Bronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 06:29 AM   #40
RCC Addict
 
sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: spotting for jeepsohigh
Posts: 1,154
Default

I am still not satisfied with the body choices so i'm going to ditch the body selection and make a truggy stlye project instead with either lexan or thin aluminum body panels like this. should i start a new thread and cancel this one with a whole new frame starting?
Attached Images
 
sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.rccrawler.com/forum/1-9-scale-rigs/57704-brushless-trophy-truck-project.html
Posted By For Type Date
Проэкт Trophy truck.Стоит ли? This thread Refback 10-07-2011 08:34 AM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com