06-24-2011, 11:29 AM | #41 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Scumrise, Flooriduh
Posts: 5,181
| |
Sponsored Links | |
06-24-2011, 11:46 AM | #42 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| Just because someone does not agree with you doesn't mean they are uneducated on the subject...nor does it mean that the person has lived a "sheltered life".... |
06-24-2011, 12:05 PM | #43 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 1,619
| But it's just easier to label and dismiss than to have a reasonable debate on a subject when other disagree with you. |
06-24-2011, 12:06 PM | #44 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: North Idaho
Posts: 3,648
| Quote:
This is how the police catch a lot of pot growers, the grow lights take a lot of electricity. A 3-bedroom house consuming the power of a warehouse constitutes probable cause. | |
06-24-2011, 12:09 PM | #45 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Where freedom is earned.
Posts: 2,011
| Quote:
Opinions are one sided, like minded people will agree, everyone else is just wrong. (that's what it seems like these days.) Why worry about legalizing pot anyway, raptures coming in Oct. | |
06-24-2011, 12:12 PM | #46 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Arlington, Washington
Posts: 2,303
|
You might wanna check your history books on this.....many states actually kept prohibition in some form until the 60s. No state that I ever read about legalized booze again prior to the 21st Amendment being accepted. As for the legalize and tax it theory not working cause people would just grow it......History doesn't support that at all. A simple fact "In 1919, a year before Prohibition went into effect, Cleveland had 1,200 legal bars. By 1923, the city had an estimated 3,000 illegal speakeasies, along with 10,000 stills.An estimated 30,000 city residents sold liquor during Prohibition, and another 100,000 made home brew or bathtub gin for themselves and friends. " There probably isn't even 1000 stills in Cleveland anymore. Making your own booze is VERY easy. From beer or wine (both legal for home brewing) to Distilled Spirits (not legal for home brewing), you rarely see any of it brewed at home. It's easy, you legalize it....people will just buy it. Sure some will grow it, but won't be anywhere near whats growing it now. Besides, you expect lazy pot smokers (pun intended) to actually do work when they can just go buy it! Later EddieO |
06-24-2011, 01:18 PM | #47 | ||
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: KCRC
Posts: 774
| Quote:
Quote:
Perhaps I should have used the word "uninformed" instead. My comment was really directed at some of the rhetoric puke that sounds like it comes stright out of a D.A.R.E. brochure, with absolutely no questioning if the governments "facts" are accurate or truthful. We all know they never lie to us. Or the, my friends cousins uncles sister on my nephews side smoked it once and now thier brain is hanging out thier ears..... | ||
06-24-2011, 01:24 PM | #48 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| Quote:
And my statement still stands....just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are "uninformed" on the subject. | |
06-24-2011, 01:27 PM | #49 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Delta B.C.
Posts: 554
| Quote:
| |
06-24-2011, 01:39 PM | #50 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: KCRC
Posts: 774
|
If they have not taken the time to truly investigate/fact check whats been force feed into thier brains, but rather just spew out whatever has been told to them as fact by some goverment cohert......then yes, I would consider them to be uninformed. But that's just my opinion . |
06-24-2011, 01:41 PM | #51 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
So, then what would you consider a good source of information on this subject? Really, I am not trying to antagonize here, just wanting an answer to my original question about the "zero side effects"... |
06-24-2011, 01:49 PM | #52 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Delta B.C.
Posts: 554
|
what doesnt have a side effect if overused?..seriously i,m very on the pro freedom side obviosly but i think its foolish to believe it has zero side effect, but i believe they are negligable with moderate use..less side effects than most perscrip meds, and alcohol, tobbacco..etc etc
|
06-24-2011, 01:51 PM | #53 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Exactly. That was my point. I really could care less if the law was changed...as long as it doesnt directly impact my life. However, I always read posts of this nature and see people saying things like what the OP of this one did in regard to "health effects".....and it simply isnt true.
|
06-24-2011, 01:55 PM | #54 | |
Scale Detail Engineering Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 5,573
| Quote:
| |
06-24-2011, 01:57 PM | #55 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2006 Location: akron
Posts: 4,054
| Quote:
Can pretty much guarantee 80% of your typical potheads are not going to work their buts off to grow some primo shit, if they can just grab a pack of good shit driving threw the local drive threw while picking up beer and Doritos... not to mention the stuff smells like shit.. your local condo/home association is not gonna let you grow it.. You can smell it threw walls.. Might be OK in the old trailer park next to the mobile meth lab.. but house's that normal people strive to live in it will never be excepted.. Last edited by sloppy; 06-24-2011 at 02:00 PM. | |
06-24-2011, 01:59 PM | #56 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Opinion: the Earth is flat Add Education New Opinion: the Earth is round Quote:
I thought adults didn't believe in imaginary holidays... | |
06-24-2011, 02:01 PM | #57 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Delta B.C.
Posts: 554
| Quote:
| |
06-24-2011, 02:02 PM | #58 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
|
Agreed. |
06-24-2011, 02:19 PM | #59 |
No idea what I'm doing Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Underground, CO
Posts: 4,529
|
I don't smoke...tried it but it wasn't my thing. However I think it should be treated like homebrewing beer. You can grow it and posses it (up to a certain amount), but you can't sell it or buy it. I think spending all this money to "fight" marijuana, or to prosecute someone because they have a joint in their pocket is a big waste. Alcohol is legal and I know a bunch of people that don't drink...it will be the same thing with pot. Everyone thinks if it's legalized, there's going to be a bunch of stoned people running around like maniacs, smoking at work, in their cars, driving trains, shooting guns, operating heavy equipment, knitting socks etc.. .......I just don't think that's the case. |
06-24-2011, 02:20 PM | #60 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Athens, TX
Posts: 78
|
Why marijuana should stay Illegal. 1910: “Marihuana is the most frightening and vicious drug ever to hit New Orleans.” —New Orleans Public Safety Commission 1920s: “Makes darkies think they’re as good as white men.” —H.J. Anslinger, Bureau of Narcotics 1930: “Marihuana is responsible for the raping of white women by crazed negroes.” —Hearst Newspapers Nationwide 1932: “Hasheesh goads users to blood lust.” —Hearst Newspapers 1935: “Marihuana influenced negroes to look at white people in the eye, step on white men’s shadows, and look at a white woman twice.” —Hearst Newspapers 1937: “Marihuana is the most violent drug in the history of mankind.” —Congressional Testimony, H.J. Anslinger, FBN 1938: “Marihuana is more dangerous than heroin or cocaine.” —Anslinger, Scientific American, May, 1938 1938: “If the hideous monster of Frankenstein came face to face with marihuana, he would drop dead of fright.” —Anslinger, FBN, quoted in Hearst newspaper 1937-50: “Negro entertainers with their jazz and swing music are declared an outgrowth of marihuana use which possesses white women to tap their feet.” —statements to Congress by Anslinger, FBN 1945: “More harmful than habit-forming opium, inducing fits of temporary insanity.” —Newsweek, 1-15-45 1946: “Marihuana is an important cause of crime.” —Bureau of Narcotics, Newsweek, 11-18-46 1948: “Marihuana leads to pacifism and Communist brainwashing.” —Anslinger, before Congress 1973: “Marijuana increases breast size in males.” 1974: “Permanent brain damage is one of the inevitable results of the use of marijuana.” —Ronald Reagan, LA Times 1974: “interferes with reproduction, disease resistance, and basic biological processes.” —Daily Oklahoman, 11-19-74 1980: “Marijuana leads to harder drugs.” —Reagan Administration 1985: “Marijuana use makes you sterile.” —Reagan Administration 1980s: “Marijuana leads to heroin; marijuana causes brain damage.” —the 17-week D.A.R.E. Program 1986: “Marijuana leads to homosexuality, the breakdown of the immune system, and therefore to AIDS.” —Carlton Turner 1990: “Marijuana makes you lazy.” —Partnership for a Drug-Free America 1992: “Marijuana is ten times more dangerous than 20 years ago.” —Presidential Candidate Bill Clinton |
| |