| |
07-24-2013, 02:21 PM
| #601 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
|  Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
No problem  |
|  |
| Sponsored Links | |
| | |
|
07-24-2013, 05:33 PM
| #602 |
| Scale Detail Engineering Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 5,573
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
does scale hardware in wheels count as a functional item?
|
|
| |
|
07-24-2013, 09:11 PM
| #603 | |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
 | |
|
| |
|
07-24-2013, 09:17 PM
| #604 | |
| Scale Detail Engineering Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 5,573
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-24-2013, 09:45 PM
| #605 | |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
I will let the big boys give the final word, but they all would only be worth a single point. Same as shackles or any other item that comes in multiples. | |
|
| |
|
07-24-2013, 10:16 PM
| #606 | |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 09:31 PM
| #607 | |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Supporting Single Moms
Posts: 979
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
 | |
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 09:33 PM
| #608 |
| Scale Detail Engineering Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Turtle Island
Posts: 5,573
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
Fra gi le... must be Italian!
|
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 10:30 PM
| #609 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 89
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
Forgive me if this has been covered. If the advertised specs of a tire specifically the new Proline SX Swamper XLs are 4.75" tall they're legal for class 2? (just wanted to be sure)
|
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 10:47 PM
| #610 | |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: CALI "209"
Posts: 1,970
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
A Christmas Story, Fragile scene - YouTube | |
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 10:53 PM
| #611 | |
| Gettin’ back on the horse Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Hoonsville
Posts: 6,671
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
| |
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 11:15 PM
| #612 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
I was hoping you guys would get that!
|
|
| |
|
07-25-2013, 11:18 PM
| #613 |
| Rock Stacker Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 89
|
Thank you for the response! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 |
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 05:05 PM
| #614 |
| Pebble Pounder  Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: SL,UT
Posts: 141
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
one thing i have wondered about is truggy frames. i get -4 for the truggy, but is that all i can get out of the rear? can i add points for rollbar, rear shock mounts and bumper? bumper would be one i think my truggy especially should be eligible for because the frame rail structure comes out to a point and the upper section forms a sort of tub creating a bumper, wider than the frame. whats the ruling here? |
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 08:35 PM
| #615 |
| Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 258
|
His work is incredible and I asked this same question on his build thread and figured I'd throw it up here and see what you guys think. It's tube but doubled up like frame rails. Would this be considered legal in class 2 under the current rules?  (chassis compliments of warren) Sent from the end of my fingertips |
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 09:25 PM
| #616 |
| Rock Crawler Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: in a Fishbowl watching time go by
Posts: 923
|
that chassis is pretty rad... but seeing as it's made of tube/rod unfortunately it would be illegal in class 2
|
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 10:15 PM
| #617 |
| Pebble Pounder Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: SL,UT
Posts: 141
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
U just had to post that gnarly truggy chassis next to my heap of crud, didnt ya? Haha Looks awesome! |
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 10:36 PM
| #618 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Australia NSW
Posts: 1,266
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
A quick question regarding wheel/tire combos. In C1 it limits the rim size to 1.9. but if someone (me) was to run a 2.2 rim with a class legal 1.9 tire stretched on, why would that not be legal as long as it still complies with the outer diameter/width limits?
|
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 10:51 PM
| #619 |
| I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Rancho Relaxo. California. USA. Earth.
Posts: 3,292
|
There are no wheel size distinctions. For example, you can run a 1.55, 1.9, 2.0 or 2.2 rim in any class. Wheels larger than 2.2 are not allowed in any class and no short course style wheels with split diameters.
|
|
| |
|
07-26-2013, 10:55 PM
| #620 |
| RCC Addict Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Australia NSW
Posts: 1,266
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
cool beans. means that rule has been relaxed since i last read them then  and iv heard that modified tires are allowed in all classes too, is this correct? |
|
| |
 |
2013 scale rules discussion or question thead - Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| koh rules 2013 discussion thread | thomass14 | North Dakota | 19 | 07-28-2016 06:24 PM |
| 2013 SORRCA Scale rules | War Pig | Scale Comp Rules | 19 | 02-11-2014 03:38 PM |
| |
Linear Mode
