01-05-2013, 09:42 PM | #1 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| 2013 scale rules discussion or question thread
Please ask any questions here. Thanks!
Last edited by War Pig; 01-07-2013 at 05:15 PM. |
Sponsored Links | |
01-05-2013, 11:28 PM | #2 |
Rock Stacker Join Date: May 2011 Location: tenino
Posts: 92
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
can we get a printable version ? |
01-06-2013, 12:18 AM | #3 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: burlington
Posts: 1,042
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
class 2? • Flatbeds that run the full length of the rail chassis are allowed. The bed must be as wide as the cab the entire length of the bed. would i not get flatbed points for this or could it be grouped in with the below statement and still get flatbed points? - Dovetailing the rear *a truggy/tube bed that is narrower than the cab counts as a dovetail |
01-06-2013, 12:52 AM | #4 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: On the G-Train!!!!!
Posts: 6,081
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
I have never understood this, you get -3 for having a functional winch, yet every time you use it, you get +3. Why is that? Isn't the time it takes you to use it penalty enough?
|
01-06-2013, 05:50 AM | #5 | |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
| |
01-06-2013, 05:52 AM | #6 |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
I think the rules look great , I thought there was going to more change and glad there's not . |
01-06-2013, 07:44 AM | #7 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: moses lake wa
Posts: 319
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
I guess my point is why follow a size that's not real? So if I build a set of super swamper sx's using the sidewall from a new pitbull2 I'm not legal if I make it the same size as the pitbull2. Something seems off with a rule that allows the supplier to make up what ever they want on the package of the product. | |
01-06-2013, 07:57 AM | #8 | |
Old guy Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Northwest Arkie-saw and we got ROCKS!
Posts: 7,548
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
You could stuff a tire with enough foam to make it out of spec, thus why we go by factory specs. I don't have a pitbull in front of me to measure. If it hasn't been mod, there would be no need to measure it cause we go by the factory specs. A pic of your over sized pitbull would be cool. | |
01-06-2013, 08:26 AM | #9 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: bonney lake
Posts: 162
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
• Tube fenders: Must be mounted to chassis - metal -1 (per pair) What's the reasoning for this. On the JK tube fenders on a real 1:1 are fender mounted, but yet on a 1:10 they have to be chassis mounted. That's one of the popular body's out there. The only time I really see a tube fender chassis mounted is on a tuber or a truck that has a full exo cage. So again I ask what's the reasoning for this? |
01-06-2013, 08:39 AM | #10 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: moses lake wa
Posts: 319
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
| |
01-06-2013, 10:20 AM | #11 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 16,952
| What good are tube fenders mounted to the fender sheet metal? Do they help keep shopping carts off the body panels at the grocery store? Maybe I can get some for my wife's Corolla...
|
01-06-2013, 10:35 AM | #12 | ||||||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Should have one in the future. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Should the above rig get the same points for a tube fender as this? I'm surprised nobody has any questions about track width/body width in Class 3...... | ||||||
01-06-2013, 10:43 AM | #13 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: London
Posts: 1,950
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
Don't mention Class 3 Tim!!!
|
01-06-2013, 10:45 AM | #14 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
I woke up this morning expecting all hell to break loose and there was no mention. Either it's easy to understand or people completely glossed over it .
|
01-06-2013, 10:54 AM | #15 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: London
Posts: 1,950
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead |
01-06-2013, 12:32 PM | #16 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: On the G-Train!!!!!
Posts: 6,081
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
Seen it. I fall within spec. I think it should keep the 1/12 bodies off AR60 axles now. |
01-06-2013, 12:57 PM | #17 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: London
Posts: 1,950
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead |
01-06-2013, 01:32 PM | #18 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead
I think the easiest way to check the Class 3 width restrictions is to buy a piece of 5/8" dowel 18" long. Drop it between the body and your tires on one side. If it hits the axle.... too wide, if it gets stuck.... you're legal! Check the other side just to make sure. Of course there will be instances where the axle won't be perfectly centered on the body (due to builder error or other reasons ) but the dowel is an easy way to check real quick.
|
01-06-2013, 01:46 PM | #19 | ||
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Turn the mayflower around.. it will never work
Posts: 1,588
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead Quote:
Quote:
if i have 7 inch from inside to inside..... and i subtract 1.25 inches per side..... being 2.5 inches total, this leaves me with 4.5 inches.... but the min of the body must be a min of 5 inches.... so if i ran a body of 5 inches wide with a width of 7 inches between inside to inside of each tire this will leave me with 1 inch per side between body and inside of tire. The max is 1.25 inches so im not seeing how the body would have to be a width of 5.75 and not just the min of 5 inch. also if i went with the min body of 5 inch and then added the max of 1.25 per side I would end up with the min i could run between tire to tire would be 7.5 inches and the example is a half inch under that measurement. So this would mean with the narrowest you could go with your measurement between tire to tire with the narrowest body width would be 7.5 inches or am i getting to the end of all this and realizing that you are saying 1.25 total??? LOL. Me math and driving down the road texting all of this is retarded. also just so im clarified on this..... we measure from the inside of the tire??? or the rim? if so how do i get an exact number of this??? do i measure where the tire is not contacting the ground? what if a rig is toed in or out? And some of the foam and tire combo allow to slide the foam around and actually move the tire one way or the other. I just want to be clear on this before i start setting my offsets on my rims and such. Last edited by JokersWild; 01-06-2013 at 01:50 PM. | ||
01-06-2013, 01:50 PM | #20 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: On the G-Train!!!!!
Posts: 6,081
| Re: 2013 scale rules discussion or question thead |
2013 scale rules discussion or question thead - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
koh rules 2013 discussion thread | thomass14 | North Dakota | 19 | 07-28-2016 06:24 PM |
2013 SORRCA Scale rules | War Pig | Scale Comp Rules | 19 | 02-11-2014 03:38 PM |
| |