10-10-2011, 12:41 PM | #61 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| Quote:
Well, I got some time in this car and let others drive it. We were all very impressed with its performance, does everything I want it to. I got the geometry and shocks right first shot. Now I just need to keep driving it. I can't wait to run in a sportsman comp! | |
Sponsored Links | |
10-25-2011, 05:34 PM | #62 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
|
Some pics from our last comp! I broke on both courses, but other than that she was doing awesome! The first two were of a really tough line. |
10-25-2011, 06:34 PM | #63 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Sumter
Posts: 6,141
|
WOW...it's hard to believe that's a shafty! Looks great |
10-25-2011, 08:19 PM | #64 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| Thanks Ryan! I'm really enjoying this car, it is able to pull off some imressive lines. Its not easy getting everything to fit in a chassis this narrow. I sure would hate to have to cover up this car with a body and hide all my hard work done to this car.
|
10-26-2011, 01:35 AM | #65 |
Newbie Join Date: May 2006 Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 28
|
Really glad that I stumbled upon this thread. Great work!! Have you considered adding more rake to the skid and using a carrier bearing with a two piece rear driveshaft for more GC? |
10-26-2011, 10:30 PM | #66 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| Quote:
After putting some time on this car I can tell I need built 540 power. So, I just rebuilt a Brood 35t, quad mag, big comm motor. I am installing it and an fxr back in the car. I will use this skid for now but will be switching to a wider one asap. | |
10-27-2011, 12:59 PM | #67 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: May 2009 Location: Bellaire
Posts: 743
|
This is a very nice Sportsman,Nice job! I have heard that the votes for the Sportsman class are leaning toward it being a bodied class. |
10-27-2011, 01:15 PM | #68 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| I just hope rules committee members are voting on what their club wants and not just autonomously. It would be a shame to screw over all the frogger, fastback, T1E, and others bodiless shafty owners. They are a large portion of current shafty drivers and should not be overlooked. That and its just another rule that kills creativity.
|
10-27-2011, 01:17 PM | #69 | |
Rock Crawler Join Date: May 2009 Location: Bellaire
Posts: 743
| Quote:
| |
10-27-2011, 02:48 PM | #70 | |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Quote:
| |
10-27-2011, 02:54 PM | #71 | |
No idea what I'm doing Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Underground, CO
Posts: 4,529
| Quote:
Where has it been talked about that Sporty is going bodiless? Somewhere here on RCC? | |
10-28-2011, 05:01 AM | #72 |
Try to Bend it Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 3,163
|
This would really suck. Especially seeing as the majority of those who have supported and pushed for a recognized sportsman class run a bodiless rig.
|
10-28-2011, 07:13 AM | #73 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: EvilCrawlerDesigns@comcast.net
Posts: 3,510
|
Shelby, very cool Sportsman. I was waiting to see a shafty version of the BJ. Nicely done. I'm not at liberty to say much of what's going on in the rules committee. If you have concerns, talk to your local rules committee member, and let them know how you feel. |
10-28-2011, 08:26 AM | #74 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 507
|
If there not going to allow bodyless in Sportsman then they should make two classes. Stock, and Sportsman. Stock=bodied and even more limits Sportsman=bodyless or bodied, no dig...ect X2 that would kill sportsman. |
10-28-2011, 08:42 AM | #75 | |
Custom Carbon Fiber Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
| Quote:
2 classes would kill it even more. Back on topic though ......... this rig just looks vicious and is making me wanna tear my scaler down for the axles and build one. | |
10-28-2011, 09:07 AM | #76 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Great Outdoors
Posts: 651
|
A lot of places want to use Sportsman as their novice/entry class to attract guys with their lhs RTR's to try the sport. Highly developed purpose-built cars driven by experienced pilots tend to keep prospectives away. This is a great car. But if I'm a first timer thinking about running my LNC, and I see this car as my competition...I might just reconsider. |
10-28-2011, 09:20 AM | #77 |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
|
Bodied cars attract way more people to the hobby than bodiless.
|
10-28-2011, 09:56 AM | #78 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| That is the only argument for a body that makes sense to me, but is it better to alienate current shafty owners and drivers in order to possibly attract new people? Will someone really not feel as bad loosing to a bodied rig over a bodiless? What happens if I take my body off in the pits and they see all the upgrades? The saying "a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush" comes to mind. There sure are a lot of bodiless guys out there currently. I would hate for the class to loose them for a theory that may not gain as many drivers as it looses. Last edited by 4xFord; 10-28-2011 at 10:06 AM. |
10-28-2011, 10:02 AM | #79 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,449
| Quote:
| |
10-28-2011, 10:03 AM | #80 | |||||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Houston
Posts: 3,761
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
| |