|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-04-2012, 04:30 PM | #21 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Burque
Posts: 3,805
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg Quote:
| |
Sponsored Links | |
09-05-2012, 06:04 AM | #22 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: pnw
Posts: 310
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg ha ha i beat you to it drilled my grears and sanded my tires 2lbs 6 oz with no motors still got a couple things to do to lighten it up a little more
|
09-05-2012, 06:08 AM | #23 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Having fun again...
Posts: 2,641
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg |
09-05-2012, 06:09 AM | #24 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: pnw
Posts: 310
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg |
09-05-2012, 08:58 AM | #25 |
2013 2.2P Nat. Champion Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: BorderLine Crawlers Season 3 is on!
Posts: 2,584
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg |
09-05-2012, 10:08 AM | #26 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Having fun again...
Posts: 2,641
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg |
09-05-2012, 10:35 AM | #27 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: QC-AZ
Posts: 2,352
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
I have a feeling that "bergish" might even be a stretch.
|
09-05-2012, 12:02 PM | #28 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 1,005
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg I was thinking the same thing. I'm not really sure Ti Fighters count as berg. They only really share "stock" gears. Maybe we need to define berg! Seems like the the most common way to define berg: Must at a minimum use the stock berg case and some assemblance of berg gears. If you don't even use that, I don't think it counts as a berg. |
09-05-2012, 12:20 PM | #29 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Having fun again...
Posts: 2,641
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg Quote:
| |
09-05-2012, 01:32 PM | #30 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Auburn, MI
Posts: 1,177
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
Well, if you want to get technical, you guys that run axial knuckles and chubs, or clover tubes, or Dlux delrin tubes, can you really say you have "Berg" axles?
|
09-05-2012, 01:39 PM | #31 |
Y-Town Crawlers Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Not Hesperia
Posts: 2,481
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
If you run axial C's and knuckles does it make it an XR10? |
09-05-2012, 01:44 PM | #32 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Arat Alabama
Posts: 2,678
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg What if a XR10 is 90% VP and RC4WD is it still an Axial? I guess it just should say originally OEM based axles, Berg or Axial Also back on topic a bit. My berg ways 2lbs-11.4oz without wheels/tires, weights, and battery. That's with SS screws and steel rod end balls. RTR weight is 4lbs 7oz with SLWs and knuckle weights. It will go 3-15 or so with CF wheels and light hardware. Last edited by TEDROCKZ; 09-05-2012 at 02:48 PM. |
09-05-2012, 01:46 PM | #33 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 722
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg Same basic design aspects. They would be just highly modified Berg axles. Not like you're using a completely different axle.
|
09-05-2012, 06:37 PM | #34 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Hampton
Posts: 751
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
Does it look like we will ever get light enough to run a smaller motor and still have some great punch for some of the new formula off road style courses?
|
09-05-2012, 06:46 PM | #35 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Arat Alabama
Posts: 2,678
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg You could do it now if all the courses were wide open and flowing from start to finish. Those 1 or 2(or more) bound up situations during the day is a deal breaker IMO. I don't believe we will get to far away from 500-540 size stuff in a true comp scenario.
|
09-05-2012, 08:17 PM | #36 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: dark corner
Posts: 485
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg Quote:
| |
09-05-2012, 08:48 PM | #37 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Having fun again...
Posts: 2,641
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg Quote:
There are more than a few top competitors running 3.5 to 3.8 lb trucks and killing the competition! | |
09-05-2012, 10:08 PM | #38 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Apple Valley,CA
Posts: 1,172
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
I just put rob_b's old chump r/t together with some d-lux tubes for rcjunky3 and it came in at 4.2lbs and works nice at that weight so far. My berg is still at 4.15 but I've been running it at that for 2 seasons and didnt ever build it to be light. Every time I practice with Del Monte I always see there is room for improvement with my rig (and driving) so Im putting an SA xr10 together for next season with weight in mind so I can experience the difference for myself.
|
09-06-2012, 07:35 PM | #39 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: pnw
Posts: 310
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
Just remember wight is a bandaid for a improper set up. Set up is every thing!!!!!!
|
09-08-2012, 04:49 PM | #40 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Glendale Az
Posts: 384
| Re: Who has the lightest Berg
Seems to me that weight bias is the real ticket here. You can go as light as you want as long as your front is a touch heavier than the rear. I continually shed weight from the rear only to find myself having to lose some in the front as well.....results were a much faster, more reliable crawler. 4.4 right now full package and I do plan on going lighter... |
Who has the lightest Berg - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Worlds Lightest Material | JeremyH | Chit Chat | 4 | 11-23-2011 11:18 AM |
Lightest 2.2 beadlocks currently available... | shelljeep | Tires and Wheels | 31 | 02-18-2011 12:05 PM |
Lightest weight 2.2 tires? | VeryBumpy | Tires and Wheels | 1 | 06-25-2009 01:17 PM |
Lightest Beadlocks?? | syncronized77 | Tires and Wheels | 2 | 04-03-2008 07:01 PM |
Lightest 2.2 Beadlocks? | Offroader5 | Tires and Wheels | 19 | 02-05-2008 01:13 AM |
| |