Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs Brand Specific Tech > Axial Brand Scale Rock Crawlers > Axial RR10 Bomber
Loading

Notices

Thread: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2016, 06:50 AM   #121
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Are VP trailing arms any better than Dlux trailing arms?

Also, my understanding is that wraith uppers will fit with Twin Hammer trailing arms with stock axles?
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-23-2016, 09:14 AM   #122
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Moving
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

I would say no because the DLux arms are made from 7075 and VPs are not. Blue Monkey also makes their TAs out of 7075. It's stronger and slides better over rocks. I personally don't like the way the hollow balls are held in the ends as well on the VP arms. They do look nice though.

Wraith uppers will be too long with TH lower arms on the stock truss and may push the pinion angle up too high. Wraith uppers are perfect for the DLux truss or a Currie truss since it is moved back farther than the stock truss.
SCREAMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 09:24 AM   #123
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Thanks for the response. Did not know that about the material difference between vp and DLux.

I have some wraith length incision uppers. I have extra jato and revo ends. Maybe I could get them to fit or is the difference in length just too big for use with TH trailing arms?

Also, when you refer to a Currie truss, is that the same as the "HD" truss? Or the truss that only comes with the Currie axles? Or are they the same?

Last edited by Drm31078; 05-23-2016 at 09:32 AM.
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 10:00 AM   #124
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Moving
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

I know the VP HD truss fits the stock axle and vise versa but I'm not sure if it moves the upper link mount back or not. I would think probably not. The Currie trusses are different and only used on Currie axles. If you already have the links, it sure doesn't hurt to try them but even with Revo ends on both ends, a Wraith upper is around 122mm long and you need something closer to 117mm long.
SCREAMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 10:26 AM   #125
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Dang. Maybe have to go wraith length TA or get DLux truss I guess.
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 10:32 AM   #126
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Moving
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

You could just get a set of the $7 Traxxas 5318 links that MNorby used on the last page. They put his pinion at a good angle.

Last edited by SCREAMER; 05-23-2016 at 10:37 AM. Reason: Spelling
SCREAMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 10:44 AM   #127
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Wyoming
Posts: 904
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

The traxxas ones with Jato ends might give a good angle without unthreading the revo end like I did but its really not unthreaded much and the revo ends are stronger from what I understand. I'm not worried about my current rear link and pinion angle setup one bit. I have my VP tierod unthreaded about the same to get my toe angle correct too, can just see 1 thread out of the rod end.
MNorby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2016, 10:55 AM   #128
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Moving
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Although, any excuse to buy one of these beauties is a good reason. Major strength upgrade and look badass too. You get tuning options with these as well with link mounting location. If you're going shorter for better crawlability, go with TH length. If you do Wraith length, you'll just wish later that you had gone shorter. Wraith length should have been stock length in my opinion. TH length performs best and looks most correct scale wise. I've seen a couple guys with Wraith length say, "I shoulda got the TH length to begin with". The Yeti arms are just way too long and give no real benefits over Wraith length. This is from first hand testing. Even my go fast Bomber has Wraith length TAs.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by SCREAMER; 05-23-2016 at 11:02 AM.
SCREAMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2016, 06:50 PM   #129
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hudsonville, MI
Posts: 875
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

I've seriously considered trying the Wraith length TA's on my BGR Bomber. I think if the wheelbase was shortened a bit, it would look so much better. Not to mention, it would perform better.
2-shot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 08:03 AM   #130
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Anyone have some UCFab wraith length trailing arms they are willing to part with? PM me.
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 08:24 AM   #131
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Roseville, Ca
Posts: 2,506
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drm31078 View Post
Anyone have some UCFab wraith length trailing arms they are willing to part with? PM me.
Curious why you sold your TH length? You could have put a longer rod end on one said and had wraith length trailing arms using your TH length arms.
84yoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 08:50 AM   #132
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Dang! I never thought about that. Where were you before in this discussion. Ha!
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 10:18 AM   #133
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Roseville, Ca
Posts: 2,506
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Lol, you never mentioned it before otherwise I would have said something. Also running longer rod ends on both ends would have got you yeti length too.
84yoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2016, 07:27 PM   #134
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 85
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

After my first comp with the th length I have to say that they worked well. I wouldn't say that that I could tell an over the top difference but time will tell.

I did calculate anti-squat before the change and will be redoing the Calc just for a comparison.
YeeP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 10:24 AM   #135
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Not sure if this is old news but JEC making their ss trailing arms in wraith length now. $65 shipped.

Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 12:04 PM   #136
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Moving
Posts: 2,580
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

I have a set of both lengths now and they are so nice. I really like how the rod ends are so protected and supported by being recessed into the trailing arm. These things slide like butter too.
SCREAMER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 12:08 PM   #137
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Nice! I just purchased some wraith length.
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 04:09 PM   #138
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 395
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCREAMER View Post
Even my go fast Bomber has Wraith length TAs.
Screamer, could you post side pics of your 2 Bombers with the 2 different length trailing arms?

I've been waiting for VP to get Yeti trailing get arms back in stock. Maybe I should look into a different length instead.

To play the devil's advocate... with side by sides they say 4 seaters are cheaters due to the longer wheel base helping out on steps. 4 door JK's also show advantage on a lot of trails by getting wheels farther over steps and obstacles where they can then help pull.

I definitely don't know enough about Wraith's, Bombers and Twin Hammers to make any real judgement. I'm just thinking out loud.
powder4breakfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 04:23 PM   #139
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 565
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Post #116 and #117 of this thread.
Drm31078 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2016, 05:09 PM   #140
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 395
Default Re: Wheelbase vs trailing arm length

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drm31078 View Post
Post #116 and #117 of this thread.
Thank you. I'm learning from so many Bomber threads that they all run together in my head. I didnt realize that I missed all of the previous page of this thread.
powder4breakfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Wheelbase vs trailing arm length - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone done a trailing arm rear suspension? 95geo Axial Wraith 26 09-03-2013 11:07 PM
Twin hammers trailing arm length? fordsuperduty Vaterra Twin Hammers 0 06-03-2013 03:57 PM
Shortcourse 4-link vs. trailing arm desertmaxx Non Crawler RC's 4 09-07-2010 06:40 PM
trailing arm links mookie Redcat Crawlers 6 07-07-2010 06:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com