|
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-21-2008, 03:35 PM | #81 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wales
Posts: 417
| |
Sponsored Links | |
10-21-2008, 03:51 PM | #82 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: RAMBLIN
Posts: 1,713
|
still? |
10-21-2008, 03:51 PM | #83 |
~THE SCALE SHOP~ Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: KILLEEN TX
Posts: 10,056
| |
10-21-2008, 04:01 PM | #84 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: 10 a see
Posts: 676
|
This is all usless babbling! If you are afraid your shafty is not able to compete with MOA's, get you a MOA. Then what are you gonna b!tch about when you can't win? I have seen someone with a stock AX-10 do very well in Super class. No dig, no nothing. STOCK! It's called SKILL! And there is not a Vendor on here that sells that! Money can't buy it either! Less than a year ago, I had never heard of R/C crawling! The first comp I went to, I didn't even know what the tennis balls were for. Within 2 or 3 months of practicing almost every day, running at GTG's, and 1 local SERCRC comp, I placed 14th at the East Coast Championship. That wasn't Newbie luck, and it wasn't money. Cause I did it with plastic knuckles, homemade driveshafts, and other various cheap parts I could piece together. It was knowing exactly how my truck would react in various situations. You got to know your truck! These people that change set-ups every week can never learn how to drive their rigs, it is different everytime they grab the remote. I was going to change over to MOA's next season, but this babbling has made me decide to keep on spanking with my shafty! That's all I got to say, now I'm going to PRACTICE! (that is the secret place where you might be able to find some skills) |
10-21-2008, 04:04 PM | #85 | |
R.I.P. Chip Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: The Crawler State
Posts: 13,938
| Quote:
The 2.2 class had a set of rules in place for many years and a new rig was built that fit within those rules. Banning that rig now or making it run in a different class would be a bad thing. The 1.9 class has an entire new set of rules written from scratch. The duratrax crawler does not fit into the new class for many reasons. Dig, width, wheelbase, tire size, ect. Have you seen a Duratrax crawler and a 1.9 class legal comp rig side by side? They are not even close to the same size. | |
10-21-2008, 04:10 PM | #86 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
|
I still see a good mix of rigs in the top 5 at all of the comps I attend, maybe its not the rigs but the pool of tallent at your local comps.
|
10-21-2008, 04:17 PM | #87 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Garden Grove
Posts: 499
| build a 1.9 class
Do what I and many others are doing. Build a 1.9 class rig. The rules are set up to keep the class competitive. I like this class. It is more my speed and can fall into a limited budget. What to do with all the leftover 2.2 stuff is another story. |
10-21-2008, 04:19 PM | #88 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
| Quote:
I hate to be the one to tell you but the 1.9's will be $800+ rigs as well..... | |
10-21-2008, 04:21 PM | #89 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Okinawa, JP
Posts: 166
| Quote:
| |
10-21-2008, 04:31 PM | #90 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: 10 a see
Posts: 676
| Thanks! Glad somebody else can see! Here is a little video of how my shafty's driveshafts and high COG and lower ground clearance, and lighter or heavier (I can't remember?) weight affects its performance. It kills me on 90 degree breakovers! HAHAHAHA!:-P http://s109.photobucket.com/albums/n...t=c182d435.pbr Last edited by CBR; 10-21-2008 at 04:39 PM. |
10-21-2008, 04:43 PM | #91 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: United States
Posts: 211
| Quote:
| |
10-21-2008, 04:49 PM | #92 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: 10 a see
Posts: 676
| |
10-21-2008, 05:32 PM | #93 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Scotland Neck
Posts: 163
| Quote:
| |
10-21-2008, 05:34 PM | #94 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
|
A halftrack would be against the rules.........
|
10-21-2008, 05:44 PM | #95 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Scotland Neck
Posts: 163
| |
10-21-2008, 05:45 PM | #96 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Columbia TN
Posts: 6,154
|
So basically its really a moa then.
|
10-21-2008, 05:50 PM | #97 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Not here
Posts: 2,814
| |
10-21-2008, 05:51 PM | #98 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Scotland Neck
Posts: 163
|
I really don't know what all the fuss is about,neither type has an all holds barred advantage over the other. Ken Miller whose father and brother I race with here in Carolina just won the Nats in Indiana and placed second in neighboring state is running a Berg. The second place guy is a shafty. Ok , shafty won the comp that Ken placed second in a Berg. Tit for tat.
|
10-21-2008, 05:52 PM | #99 |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Scotland Neck
Posts: 163
| |
10-21-2008, 05:59 PM | #100 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: spring hill TN
Posts: 2,959
|
I do not see the Moa rigs being heavier than the shafties. My Moa rig including 3cell 2000Mah without the wheels and tires is only 4lbs 2oz. how much do most shafties weigh without just the wheels and tires? |
| |