Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Scale Rigs Brand Specific Tech > Axial Brand Scale Rock Crawlers > Axial SCX-10
Loading

Notices

Thread: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-21-2013, 02:59 PM   #41
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Louisbaby View Post
It's been said before, but thanks for this thread dude. Great info all in one place.

Question: with regards to weight and COG. In the standard setup, you have your battery on the plate above the front axle mounted on the 3 stand off posts. Now different people have different ideas with regards to switching to saddle packs on the rock sliders, and removing the battery plate over the front axle.

Then others say to add wheel weights to the stock setup.

My question is which is the better option? I have a Dingo that's pretty much stock, except for brushless system, and about 200 grams per front tire.

Thanks for your help...
I currently run saddle packs on the sliders...Some may run smaller Mah batteries but just use one at a time in the same location.

Weight in the wheels is more a traction enhancement even though it does help with weight distribution.

Ill be covering that shortly as the last segment to this particular thread.

The 2 most common places are just in front of the trans or on the sliders...Either is a much better choice to over the axles.

I use 3.5oz of weight in each tire on mine currently.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 12-21-2013 at 03:05 PM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-21-2013, 03:13 PM   #42
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

I have to add though I don't care for a lot of weight...this is the main reason I went with a saddle pack to mount on the sliders..im 35g more using a 4800 saddle pack than a 4000mah single 2 cell that I used over the front axle at first.

If I used 2 2s batteries of that capacity I would have double the weight on the springs..Not that its super super heavy but you want to keep it as light as possible.

Weight is better used below the chassis or whats known as un sprung weight.

Ill explain that in the section.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 04:31 AM   #43
Rock Stacker
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Nampa
Posts: 95
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6sharky9 View Post
What is it you did to gain more travel without changing shocks?

Only thing i can think of maybe is a rear truss that mounts a lot lower in the center and if it had extended bracing like the stock one it would have to be a lot lower as well. or none at all.

But i found the stock truss to hit in 2 places ..The top and the extended bracing...So that was what i come up with to solve that issue without buying parts.


I didn't do anything. I simply do not see the need to increase vertical travel because I've yet to see a situation where the rear suspension is compressed to its limit on both sides at once though I guess it could happen if you fell tail first into a crevasse. I disagree with your solution because I do not believe there is a problem to be solved by it.
CBR74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 05:37 AM   #44
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: williamsport
Posts: 8,649
Default

Ill have to agree with CBR here.

I run a limiting strap from the center of the axle to the center of the crossbrace above it. Its bout half the shock travel.

I still get full articulation and since both shocks Never compress at the same time, up travel isn't a issue.
I thought the same thing when I started tho, even with the servo squeezing up in the front..
winnerone23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 08:35 AM   #45
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBR74 View Post
I didn't do anything. I simply do not see the need to increase vertical travel because I've yet to see a situation where the rear suspension is compressed to its limit on both sides at once though I guess it could happen if you fell tail first into a crevasse. I disagree with your solution because I do not believe there is a problem to be solved by it.
I can see your view on that...Its most definitely not a situation where both sides are equally compressed often but it does happen..It was something I experienced though more than once so I decided to resolve what I considered a problem for myself maybe others.

The front was done for some of the same issue as the rear was..In the front when the servo horn gets slammed into the brace when the front is evenly compressed my thoughts are that's not very good for the servo..But more downward travel is given with the change as well as better strength for the end of the chassis rails having moved the brace forward to solve the issue...I see this a 2 benefits in one mod.

Its not a change one would consider a regret for doing on either end.

Id rather my shocks absorb impact when it does happen rather than slam my rear axle into the brace maybe cracking the case or in the front breaking a servo....The farther spaced out bracing again a benefit to the chassis strength on the rear.

But like I say I see where it may not happen often like you say and can accept that..But it does happen and It will happen to others...It happened enough for me that I made the change...So maybe some can decide if its right for them or not to make those changes.

I personally did it more so to gain the travel..but if some feels it doesn't help them with that then maybe do it for the fact you have a stronger chassis...Either way it has a benefit.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 12-22-2013 at 08:52 AM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 08:56 AM   #46
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fairfield ME
Posts: 3,886
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

The bottoming issue really comes down to how you use the truck. My scx10 or my hilux never see both shocks on an axle fully compressed at the same time. My wraith on the other hand often sees all four shocks bottomed out at the same time when landing from a jump. My other scalers never see that situation.
Calderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 09:19 AM   #47
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calderwood View Post
The bottoming issue really comes down to how you use the truck. My scx10 or my hilux never see both shocks on an axle fully compressed at the same time. My wraith on the other hand often sees all four shocks bottomed out at the same time when landing from a jump. My other scalers never see that situation.

Most of my situations were dropping issues off an obstacle. not always by choice.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2013, 09:42 AM   #48
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Ive got some marks on my brace where the servo horn up front was hitting it pretty hard....just going down a hill with any sort of speed will compress your front end evenly once you hit bottom as all the weight is on the front....Ive gone down one hill to try to get enough speed to go up another before..so once the front starts going up the rear then gets forced down evenly...Also I may drive myself off a rock by mistake and its taken some hard hits landing flat sometime...My truck is evenly balance so it doesn't go nose first or tail first per say but determines the angle I was on before the drop...Its rare I land and it just compresses one side.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 12-22-2013 at 09:48 AM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2013, 05:47 PM   #49
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Port Saint Lucie, Florida
Posts: 1,050
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Just gave the thread a read. Lots of good info!

Just curious if you consider adding parts from a kit parts tree to the driveshafts? Should help prevent the driveshafts from collapsing under high torque.

It's another free DIY upgrade
Richterat83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2013, 08:40 PM   #50
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richterat83 View Post
Just gave the thread a read. Lots of good info!

Just curious if you consider adding parts from a kit parts tree to the driveshafts? Should help prevent the driveshafts from collapsing under high torque.

It's another free DIY upgrade
I am considering that..i haven't yet trying to see if I can break them but so far I haven't..Its the parts tree with the 3 link arm on it..It fits pretty snug.

have read that mod can help stock driveshafts survive some 3s power..not in all cases but I can see how it would strengthen the hollow driveshafts...Some have used steel bolts and even tubing inside them.

The free way is to use the parts tree though..
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 03:33 PM   #51
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

This post was moved to another post in the tips and tricks sections.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 01-19-2014 at 07:15 PM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 03:58 PM   #52
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Marion
Posts: 187
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Sxc10 noob here! I've tore my slash 4x4 up n down and changed countless parts but crawling is new to me. I have the rtr jeep wrangler rubicon coming. Looking at this thread the gearing combo is a question. I have searched various places and cannot find any t gears great then 15-14. The suggested 16t cannot be found. If I plan on trail walking and driving along, what gear should I be looking for?

Also, the aluminum parts recommended are also difficult for me to find. I found some at amainhobbies. Do you have any links for parts that users recommend? Should I use parts that come with the kit? Thanksr
Biomedchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 04:41 PM   #53
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biomedchad View Post
Sxc10 noob here! I've tore my slash 4x4 up n down and changed countless parts but crawling is new to me. I have the rtr jeep wrangler rubicon coming. Looking at this thread the gearing combo is a question. I have searched various places and cannot find any t gears great then 15-14. The suggested 16t cannot be found. If I plan on trail walking and driving along, what gear should I be looking for?

Also, the aluminum parts recommended are also difficult for me to find. I found some at amainhobbies. Do you have any links for parts that users recommend? Should I use parts that come with the kit? Thanksr
many places carry 16T pinions..Its not an uncommon size.

I still recommend the 16T pinion with the stock or even a better 27T motor.

It will give you a good combination of speed and improved low rpm control.

I purchase most everything off ebay so its easy to search the part.

Type in 16 tooth pinion and you will find one..i promise.

You will want to change the suspension links as they are plastic on the rtr and don't give any support to the axles under power very well...A lot make home made links but you can find links just about anyplace as well..Only buy a set that describes the links as being for the Honcho or the rubicon or "Long wheel base" as they have a larger wheel base and use longer links than the standard kits you see more of advertised for sale. (Dingo)

The steering links are also a must to change..youll see why when you get your kit...lol

To get you started this is what I recommend for a great start.

1.)Aluminum suspension links
2.)Aluminum steering links
3.) bearing upgrade for the stock servo or a decent replacement upgrade such as a Hitec HS645MG
4.) 16T motor pinion
5.) 2S lipo power
6.) Deans battery plug
7.) remove the rubber stoppers on the shock shafts
8.) Install the top of the shocks to the holes leaning them in the direction of the transmission front and rear.
9.) consider a 4 link conversion over the stock 3 link up front as its very weak and pulls apart as well in some cases...will require additional links and hardware to install...the 4 link truss comes in the spare parts bag.
10.) Tighten your slipper clutch tight so it doesn't slip...(This can increase the risk of breaking something in the drivetrain but it gives you maximum power to the wheels)

This covers the main weak points and some improved set-up that will get you going reliably...If you find you are breaking other items then upgrade as needed to solve the issue.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 01-01-2014 at 05:33 PM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 05:54 PM   #54
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Marion
Posts: 187
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Cool thanks. I found the axial kit that includes everything to upgrade steering and suspension links.
Biomedchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 05:56 PM   #55
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Marion
Posts: 187
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

I have a 16 t pinion gear for my slash. Reckon that would fit. Same shaft size? Don't have the rubicon til Friday. Trying to get a jump.
Biomedchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 06:07 PM   #56
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biomedchad View Post
I have a 16 t pinion gear for my slash. Reckon that would fit. Same shaft size? Don't have the rubicon til Friday. Trying to get a jump.
I think its a 3mm shaft...im thinking it will work..thats pretty much a standard size for 540 motors if im not mistaken.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 09:45 PM   #57
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brackenfell, South Africa
Posts: 448
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biomedchad View Post
I have a 16 t pinion gear for my slash. Reckon that would fit. Same shaft size? Don't have the rubicon til Friday. Trying to get a jump.
Just check the pitch.
Louisbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 09:51 PM   #58
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Marion
Posts: 187
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

16t. 32 pitch? Am i in business with this one ?
Biomedchad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 09:55 PM   #59
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brackenfell, South Africa
Posts: 448
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biomedchad View Post
16t. 32 pitch? Am i in business with this one ?
If I'm not mistaken, the stock pitch it 48
Louisbaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 11:46 PM   #60
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: Stock SCX10 Performance Tech.

Yea..sorry..Should've been more informative..the stock gears are 48P
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Stock SCX10 Performance Tech. - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vanquish Currie axle vs stock performance uclabruins89 Axial SCX-10 3 07-05-2013 01:18 AM
Does angling the shocks on scx10 help with performance raiders32 Axial SCX-10 4 11-17-2011 08:46 PM
Stock RTR Honcho Performance*Questions. Bryan732 Axial SCX-10 7 07-04-2010 06:21 PM
Stock Bully ARTR Kit Performance Question Paul97 RC4WD Bully 11 01-28-2010 02:08 PM
stock cr-01 tire performance Defender Tires and Wheels 1 06-18-2008 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com