12-30-2013, 06:06 PM | #141 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
Since this is the first of the V2's to show breakage, is there anyone else having any issues with them? I'll post a video soon to show just how much these can take before they have any issues. Also, to follow up with aluminum or delrin versions, I'd be looking at a price somewhere closer to $40 per pair if I had 50 pairs made. Still looking into other machine shops though... | |
Sponsored Links | |
12-30-2013, 06:37 PM | #142 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
[QUOTE=monkeyracer These do make a good difference in the performance, but I'd love to see some real-world testing done to show the capabilities. Anyone have video of before and after to show this off? I was working on a video myself, but the camera I am using was starting to throw a tantrum, and didn't record the video. If no one else does, I will probably have something by the end of the week to show the difference these make.[/QUOTE] A simple board placed up against a wall with an incline enough to get the front to lift under power vs with the brackets installed..It should show how it keeps the front planted more firmly as you get less rear squat and keep more weight/ traction to the front tires I know the ones I made for my honcho awhile back (from carbon fiber) has definitely helped with climbing steeper inclines and not flipping over near as much..Im sure yours do the exact same thing. Its going to be a great product when you get it settled in...will be worth every penny for the performance gains one will get. Ive seen people spend a lot more for a lot less in a product. Last edited by 6sharky9; 12-30-2013 at 06:47 PM. |
12-30-2013, 07:42 PM | #143 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: SSF
Posts: 1,614
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
The side that broke for me was simply by hand, no steroids. The other side I can not break. I didn't try to lever a break on it. The honeycomb looks very close to the edge on the one that broke, about .5mm of perimeter. Really shop around some machine prices. There are several guys here who can do it for a good price. Ask around in the Vendor's Hideout. |
12-30-2013, 07:50 PM | #144 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
The shell on these should only be about .4mm thick, and I can go in increments of .2mm, but I haven't noticed a significant difference past two shells. I'll post something in the VH soon about it to see who would be willing to quote that out. | |
12-30-2013, 08:23 PM | #145 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 1,168
| JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
Jens got my replacement V2s and these look solid, much appreciated. I'll be going to a gtg this weekend to try them out. I hope it will hold up to some Pro4HD 3500kv power. Not that I'm going to be gunning it but give it a punch of power or 2 to crawl over some rocks when the power is needed. Also if you decide to go aluminum put me on waiting list for set. Thanks muddy Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
12-31-2013, 10:32 AM | #146 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: SSF
Posts: 1,614
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
| |
12-31-2013, 12:35 PM | #147 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
Ordered up a full kit for everything you offer for the SCX. Going to try and paint them as well. |
01-01-2014, 11:38 PM | #148 |
MODERHATER™ Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,939
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
More testing please. R&D goes a long way.....
|
01-02-2014, 11:59 AM | #149 |
Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry |
01-02-2014, 01:24 PM | #150 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
The company that makes the printer and the software for the printer have released version notes for their newest software version, and one note that pertains to what has happened with a lot of the failures here is: Quote:
There has been quite a bit of R&D in the process, but with software issues like I posted above, there can still be problems I wasn't aware of. That post would have been better in the thread about the trusses, but it helps to highlight the software issue and what can possibly result. Quote:
I am looking into other materials that can be printed, but so far, ABS is the most reliable to print and reliable once printed. (Looking into Nylon and Polycarbonate, but I'm seeing mixed results from other people that have used it.) | ||
01-02-2014, 02:05 PM | #151 | |
Pebble Pounder Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 197
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
*Disclaimer* I haven't followed the different threads for your different products. This is the first I've poked my nose into any of these threads, but the general "feel" of your products isn't good with my and other locals' experience with them. Originally I bought the v1 link risers. Those failed on me in under a foot of my chassis rolling. I have since gotten the v2 risers and haven't been able to test them yet. I will be making a brace to give them a better chance of surviving with my driving style as I simply don't trust the ABS to last long. This 4-link truss didn't even survive install. The lower ear that backs the long, through casing screw cracked on me with minimal torque on it. Installed longer screws and a backing washer/nut. Fixed. Went to tighten the upper link screws and, with minimal torque again, completely split the mounts off of the truss. Is it true that you omitted the internal honeycomb structure on the v2 risers? If so, you need to do the same to all the trusses unless you decide to ditch the printing for suspension applications (which I would) and machine some aluminum pieces (preferred). I really like the general idea you have with these pieces and the design of them. It's just the material and manufacturing methods that aren't cutting it. Marcus | |
01-02-2014, 02:29 PM | #152 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
As stated before, the software issue was the cause of pretty much any breakage. Yes, some suspension components would not be suited for 3D Printing, but the pieces I made available have gone through a lot of effort on design and there haven been many more revisions than what is shown here. I hope that everyone sees that I am going to great lengths to resolve these issues to make sure your money is well spent. 3D printing is still a new technology to the RC world, so there are bound to be some hurdles, but I think the parts that I have available now, and those that are in testing to be released soon are also good to go. I've updated my printer software to prevent the missed layer/infill problem, and so far the things I have been printing are not having any troubles. | |
01-03-2014, 06:02 PM | #153 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
|
First test run, carpet wheelie busted both sides version 2's Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
01-03-2014, 06:03 PM | #154 |
Suck it up! Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
Carpet wheelies are really, really hard on things. I've blown transmissions doing that...
|
01-03-2014, 06:05 PM | #155 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
|
From a dead stop too no reversing Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
01-03-2014, 06:18 PM | #156 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
Quote:
Yes, agree, that's not the way to test things, and really you should never be going from dead stop to 100% throttle. It's all about finesse. The replacements should hold up to even that abuse though... | ||
01-03-2014, 06:39 PM | #157 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
|
Here's another pic if it helps PM sent Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
01-03-2014, 08:08 PM | #158 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: the not so white north
Posts: 1,299
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
I received mine last week and 3 out if the 4 sets I got have broken so far. I will post a couple pics up shortly. 2 I broke in my hand and the other lasted 5 mins in the rig. great design just think they need to be done in aluminum.
|
01-03-2014, 08:53 PM | #159 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: May 2011 Location: Lost in Oregon
Posts: 4,450
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry
I would be happy to buy the aluminum.... I think with all the replacement sets you've had to mail out, at some point you're going to have to see a loss here and no longer offer these... Great idea, just make them in aluminum. I bet you'll be surprised at how many you sell. |
01-03-2014, 11:17 PM | #160 | ||
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
| Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry Quote:
Quote:
| ||
JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JC Auto Design - SCX10/AX10 Axle Truss, Panhard and CMS options | monkeyracer | Axles, Trannys, T-case | 159 | 08-20-2014 11:54 PM |
Trailfinder linked geometry vs SCX10 geometry | arnesto | RC4WD Trail Finder 2 | 0 | 05-04-2013 10:17 PM |
upper link geometry.. | pitcher2103 | General Crawlers | 3 | 05-05-2012 01:07 PM |
Upper Link Geometry Question | mann0mann | General Crawlers | 28 | 02-12-2010 02:35 PM |
Lipo Rear Upper Link??? | BMFOTP | Electronics | 5 | 05-19-2009 11:00 AM |
| |