Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Vendors > Vendors Market > Chassis and Suspension
Loading

Notices

Thread: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2013, 06:06 PM   #141
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepinDoug View Post
Got my version 2s in the mail today.
I'm sorry to say this but it broke in my hands.
No need to send more or refund, just chalk it up to prototyping experience.
I just grabbed a set from the same batch as the ones those came from and really tried to get them to break like that. Didn't happen. Not sure how they broke in your hands, but I couldn't get them to do that. I even grabbed a couple hex drivers to get better leverage and still couldn't get them to break.

Since this is the first of the V2's to show breakage, is there anyone else having any issues with them?

I'll post a video soon to show just how much these can take before they have any issues.


Also, to follow up with aluminum or delrin versions, I'd be looking at a price somewhere closer to $40 per pair if I had 50 pairs made. Still looking into other machine shops though...
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-30-2013, 06:37 PM   #142
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

[QUOTE=monkeyracer
These do make a good difference in the performance, but I'd love to see some real-world testing done to show the capabilities. Anyone have video of before and after to show this off? I was working on a video myself, but the camera I am using was starting to throw a tantrum, and didn't record the video. If no one else does, I will probably have something by the end of the week to show the difference these make.[/QUOTE]

A simple board placed up against a wall with an incline enough to get the front to lift under power vs with the brackets installed..It should show how it keeps the front planted more firmly as you get less rear squat and keep more weight/ traction to the front tires

I know the ones I made for my honcho awhile back (from carbon fiber) has definitely helped with climbing steeper inclines and not flipping over near as much..Im sure yours do the exact same thing.

Its going to be a great product when you get it settled in...will be worth every penny for the performance gains one will get.
Ive seen people spend a lot more for a lot less in a product.

Last edited by 6sharky9; 12-30-2013 at 06:47 PM.
6sharky9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:42 PM   #143
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SSF
Posts: 1,614
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

The side that broke for me was simply by hand, no steroids.
The other side I can not break. I didn't try to lever a break on it.
The honeycomb looks very close to the edge on the one that broke, about .5mm of perimeter.
Really shop around some machine prices. There are several guys here who can do it for a good price. Ask around in the Vendor's Hideout.
JeepinDoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:50 PM   #144
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepinDoug View Post
The side that broke for me was simply by hand, no steroids.
The other side I can not break. I didn't try to lever a break on it.
The honeycomb looks very close to the edge on the one that broke, about .5mm of perimeter.
Really shop around some machine prices. There are several guys here who can do it for a good price. Ask around in the Vendor's Hideout.
Interesting... i have no problem sending another set if you are willing to give it one more shot.

The shell on these should only be about .4mm thick, and I can go in increments of .2mm, but I haven't noticed a significant difference past two shells.

I'll post something in the VH soon about it to see who would be willing to quote that out.
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:23 PM   #145
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 1,168
Default JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Jens got my replacement V2s and these look solid, much appreciated. I'll be going to a gtg this weekend to try them out. I hope it will hold up to some Pro4HD 3500kv power. Not that I'm going to be gunning it but give it a punch of power or 2 to crawl over some rocks when the power is needed. Also if you decide to go aluminum put me on waiting list for set. Thanks muddy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
muddywaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 10:32 AM   #146
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SSF
Posts: 1,614
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeyracer View Post
Interesting... i have no problem sending another set if you are willing to give it one more shot.

The shell on these should only be about .4mm thick, and I can go in increments of .2mm, but I haven't noticed a significant difference past two shells.

I'll post something in the VH soon about it to see who would be willing to quote that out.
I'm good thanks, but I will be watching this for aluminum revisions.
JeepinDoug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2013, 12:35 PM   #147
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Castle Rock, WA
Posts: 8,785
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Ordered up a full kit for everything you offer for the SCX. Going to try and paint them as well.
Szczerba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2014, 11:38 PM   #148
666
MODERHATER™
 
666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,939
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

More testing please. R&D goes a long way.....
Attached Images
 
666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 11:59 AM   #149
Moderator
 
badhoopty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by 666 View Post
More testing please. R&D goes a long way.....
i just dont see how making something with a fancy hi-tech cnc glue gun is at all dependable for suspension components.

but, as ive said before my ignorance to 3d printing is pretty deep...
badhoopty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 01:24 PM   #150
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

The company that makes the printer and the software for the printer have released version notes for their newest software version, and one note that pertains to what has happened with a lot of the failures here is:

Quote:
5. Bug fix for some non-manifold objects slicing with missing layers or with filled in handles or holes
What this means is that the printer was deleting parts of the object when it printed. Imagine if you printed something in 2D on an inkjet printer, and it just decided to skip a couple lines, that is basically what the printer software did.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 666 View Post
More testing please. R&D goes a long way.....
There has been quite a bit of R&D in the process, but with software issues like I posted above, there can still be problems I wasn't aware of.
That post would have been better in the thread about the trusses, but it helps to highlight the software issue and what can possibly result.

Quote:
Originally Posted by badhoopty View Post
i just dont see how making something with a fancy hi-tech cnc glue gun is at all dependable for suspension components.

but, as ive said before my ignorance to 3d printing is pretty deep...
There's no glue involved. It's basically a thermo-injection machine that injects the molten plastic layer by layer to build up the shape. Each layer melts into the previous one, making a bond with that layer.

I am looking into other materials that can be printed, but so far, ABS is the most reliable to print and reliable once printed. (Looking into Nylon and Polycarbonate, but I'm seeing mixed results from other people that have used it.)
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 02:05 PM   #151
Pebble Pounder
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 197
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeyracer View Post
The company that makes the printer and the software for the printer have released version notes for their newest software version, and one note that pertains to what has happened with a lot of the failures here is:



What this means is that the printer was deleting parts of the object when it printed. Imagine if you printed something in 2D on an inkjet printer, and it just decided to skip a couple lines, that is basically what the printer software did.



There has been quite a bit of R&D in the process, but with software issues like I posted above, there can still be problems I wasn't aware of.
That post would have been better in the thread about the trusses, but it helps to highlight the software issue and what can possibly result.



There's no glue involved. It's basically a thermo-injection machine that injects the molten plastic layer by layer to build up the shape. Each layer melts into the previous one, making a bond with that layer.

I am looking into other materials that can be printed, but so far, ABS is the most reliable to print and reliable once printed. (Looking into Nylon and Polycarbonate, but I'm seeing mixed results from other people that have used it.)
I'm the guy who took that picture of the new, destroyed truss. Patrick was kind enough to post it for me.

*Disclaimer*
I haven't followed the different threads for your different products. This is the first I've poked my nose into any of these threads, but the general "feel" of your products isn't good with my and other locals' experience with them.

Originally I bought the v1 link risers. Those failed on me in under a foot of my chassis rolling. I have since gotten the v2 risers and haven't been able to test them yet. I will be making a brace to give them a better chance of surviving with my driving style as I simply don't trust the ABS to last long.

This 4-link truss didn't even survive install. The lower ear that backs the long, through casing screw cracked on me with minimal torque on it. Installed longer screws and a backing washer/nut. Fixed. Went to tighten the upper link screws and, with minimal torque again, completely split the mounts off of the truss.

Is it true that you omitted the internal honeycomb structure on the v2 risers? If so, you need to do the same to all the trusses unless you decide to ditch the printing for suspension applications (which I would) and machine some aluminum pieces (preferred).

I really like the general idea you have with these pieces and the design of them. It's just the material and manufacturing methods that aren't cutting it.

Marcus
Draggermirage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 02:29 PM   #152
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Draggermirage View Post
I'm the guy who took that picture of the new, destroyed truss. Patrick was kind enough to post it for me.

*Disclaimer*
I haven't followed the different threads for your different products. This is the first I've poked my nose into any of these threads, but the general "feel" of your products isn't good with my and other locals' experience with them.

Originally I bought the v1 link risers. Those failed on me in under a foot of my chassis rolling. I have since gotten the v2 risers and haven't been able to test them yet. I will be making a brace to give them a better chance of surviving with my driving style as I simply don't trust the ABS to last long.

This 4-link truss didn't even survive install. The lower ear that backs the long, through casing screw cracked on me with minimal torque on it. Installed longer screws and a backing washer/nut. Fixed. Went to tighten the upper link screws and, with minimal torque again, completely split the mounts off of the truss.

Is it true that you omitted the internal honeycomb structure on the v2 risers? If so, you need to do the same to all the trusses unless you decide to ditch the printing for suspension applications (which I would) and machine some aluminum pieces (preferred).

I really like the general idea you have with these pieces and the design of them. It's just the material and manufacturing methods that aren't cutting it.

Marcus
Thank you for the info on the breakage. I have had many successful installs with my parts, but only those with problems seem to be the ones posting. I've been hearing good results, but I'd love for those people to chime in and let everyone know they are not having any issues. These can only get better if I know what is AND isn't working.

As stated before, the software issue was the cause of pretty much any breakage. Yes, some suspension components would not be suited for 3D Printing, but the pieces I made available have gone through a lot of effort on design and there haven been many more revisions than what is shown here.

I hope that everyone sees that I am going to great lengths to resolve these issues to make sure your money is well spent. 3D printing is still a new technology to the RC world, so there are bound to be some hurdles, but I think the parts that I have available now, and those that are in testing to be released soon are also good to go. I've updated my printer software to prevent the missed layer/infill problem, and so far the things I have been printing are not having any troubles.
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 06:02 PM   #153
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
Default

First test run, carpet wheelie busted both sides version 2's




Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
mikro383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 06:03 PM   #154
Suck it up!
 
Duuuuuuuude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 11,652
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Carpet wheelies are really, really hard on things. I've blown transmissions doing that...
Duuuuuuuude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 06:05 PM   #155
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
Default

From a dead stop too no reversing

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
mikro383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 06:18 PM   #156
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikro383 View Post
First test run, carpet wheelie busted both sides version 2's
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
Looks like you have tapped threads, so you have an early V2. Send me a PM with your shipping info and I will send you out a current replacement...

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikro383 View Post
From a dead stop too no reversing

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
How often are you going to smash the gas from a dead stop on carpet?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duuuuuuuude View Post
Carpet wheelies are really, really hard on things. I've blown transmissions doing that...
Yes, agree, that's not the way to test things, and really you should never be going from dead stop to 100% throttle. It's all about finesse. The replacements should hold up to even that abuse though...
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 06:39 PM   #157
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: grand junction
Posts: 309
Default

Here's another pic if it helps PM sent


Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
mikro383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 08:08 PM   #158
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: the not so white north
Posts: 1,299
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

I received mine last week and 3 out if the 4 sets I got have broken so far. I will post a couple pics up shortly. 2 I broke in my hand and the other lasted 5 mins in the rig. great design just think they need to be done in aluminum.
mammoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 08:53 PM   #159
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Lost in Oregon
Posts: 4,450
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

I would be happy to buy the aluminum....
I think with all the replacement sets you've had to mail out, at some point you're going to have to see a loss here and no longer offer these...

Great idea, just make them in aluminum. I bet you'll be surprised at how many you sell.
Postclanker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 11:17 PM   #160
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Golden
Posts: 2,588
Default Re: JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry

Quote:
Originally Posted by mammoth View Post
I received mine last week and 3 out if the 4 sets I got have broken so far. I will post a couple pics up shortly. 2 I broke in my hand and the other lasted 5 mins in the rig. great design just think they need to be done in aluminum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Postclanker View Post
I would be happy to buy the aluminum....
I think with all the replacement sets you've had to mail out, at some point you're going to have to see a loss here and no longer offer these...

Great idea, just make them in aluminum. I bet you'll be surprised at how many you sell.
Just coming down to price. Lowest quotes I am getting back are about $45/pair, and that's just cost, I'd have to price them higher than that to make anything out of them. I'm still looking at refining the design and getting some more reasonable machining quotes.
monkeyracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



JC Auto Design - SCX10 Rear Upper Link Risers - Improved geometry - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JC Auto Design - SCX10/AX10 Axle Truss, Panhard and CMS options monkeyracer Axles, Trannys, T-case 159 08-20-2014 11:54 PM
Trailfinder linked geometry vs SCX10 geometry arnesto RC4WD Trail Finder 2 0 05-04-2013 10:17 PM
upper link geometry.. pitcher2103 General Crawlers 3 05-05-2012 01:07 PM
Upper Link Geometry Question mann0mann General Crawlers 28 02-12-2010 02:35 PM
Lipo Rear Upper Link??? BMFOTP Electronics 5 05-19-2009 11:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com