Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > RCCrawler Brand Specific Tech > Team Losi Comp Crawler
Loading

Notices

Thread: Robbobs LCC

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2010, 09:20 AM   #41
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 913
Default

If you can, weith the original servo mounts from the top of the trans, and the receiver plate together just to compare the weight differences. I can do it to, but the same scale while comparing is always better.
Scottmisfits is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 01-17-2010, 10:51 AM   #42
RcBros Hobbies
 
RcBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,646
Default

I chose not to use delrin simply because of strength. Our production mount we plan to sale will weigh less then this one as we are shaving off more material, but even at that its near the stock rear mount weight as it sits in the pictures.

The production model has also shifted the servo over a few 100's of an inch to allow more driveline clearance. We left the cutout for the servo larger to accomedate some of the other servos with slightly larger cases.

Judging by your picture with the short link, your ball stud on the trany side looks to be slightly crooked. Is this just the picture or is that the case. Thanks for the pictures and writeup!
RcBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 01:44 PM   #43
Rock Crawler
 
chevellian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lititz
Posts: 787
Default

Yeah, I was thinking weight. May not be an issue though.
chevellian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 02:19 PM   #44
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RcBro View Post
Judging by your picture with the short link, your ball stud on the trany side looks to be slightly crooked. Is this just the picture or is that the case. Thanks for the pictures and writeup!
yeah the mount at the tranny side is not totally vertical. It does move back and forth a bit but thats the rod itself. the mnt piece is brand new so its not rounded out inside.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 08:58 AM   #45
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

thought id update my current setup with what i been running from what ive learned reading through a lot of these LCC threads.

Front:

Rod Arm - Top
Shock Arm - B
Shock Mount - Hole 2
Oil - 60wt
Piston - 55
Springs - Gold
Preload - 1/2'' down from top of threads
External Limiter - 15mm fuel tube


Rear:

Rod Arm - Bottom
Shock Arm - B
Shock Mount - Hole 3
Oil - 55wt
Piston - 56
Springs - Gold
Preload - 1/2'' down from top of threads
External Limiter - 15mm fuel tube


Eritex adjustable bead locks front and rear - frt total weight 18oz each wheel - rears total 14oz each wheel

HB Rovers blue compounds - AKA 1/8scale medium tire inserts + Acer foams acting as a two stage.

Tekin RS w/ 17.5 - 13T pinion ........ still using the Prototype mount RCBros made for the dig servo with a Hitec 5245 servo

I swapped out all the frame screws with Ti-screws and mini lock nuts like Del Monte did. Definatily a should do thing for anyone wanting to lower the CG. I didnt weight all the screws together but for a comparison I weighed one of the steel screws that mounts the chassis cross members with a Ti screw the same length. The steel one weighed .025oz where as the Ti-screw weighed in at .010oz ...... with that being the shortest screwed replaced you can only imagine how much is saved when all of them is done.

I also flipped the front shocks and changed the ball ends on the shaft to some Delrin balls from RPM, another weight saver for up top.

I played with oils quite a bit after reading Eeepee and Del Monte's posts. I tried 90wt front with 54pistons and 70wt rear with 55pistons. It felt as though the front controlled the rear to much when articulating with the 90wt and the rear having the 70wt in it made the front work way to hard. It felt as though the rear on turns forced the front axle into the ground causing my tires to actually roll over and push. On inclines the rig seemed to want to flip back to easily, rotating on the rear axle not letting it squat enough to keep the front down.

Went to 60wt rear with 55pistons - left the front and actually noticed a loss of front bite. Now the rig felt as though I lost my front bite on inclines and the tires were fighting for grip. The weight transfer fell to much on the rear wheels. It didnt seem to want to pivot the front up and over but let the suspension compress and taking the weight to the rear.

After some more reading again and seeing the terrain Eeepee was running on I dropped my front oil down to the 60wt with 55pistons. Reading how he felt with the rear working the front hard I decided to try the 55oil with the 56 pistons.

Also shock location has seemed to help the rig as well. I started the shocks in hole 3 for the front and hole 4 for the rear but have leaned them back one more hole each. It feels now that the rig stays flatter on side hills and when articulating.

This has felt the best so far for me. On inclines the weight feels like it doesnt transfer back as fast, the rear helps keep the front heavier allowing the front to bite. The front axle feels like the tires are biting onto anything they can find and not hunting for traction. Before I felt like the front would control what the chassis did, I dont seem to get that unpredictable chassis movement as the front is doing its job. The rig seems to flow smoother on sidehills and around obstacles were as before it would want to roll the chassis around wanting to roll over.

I finally bit the bullet and went brushless too. I raced Novak equipment for years and always had great luck with them but at heart Ive always been a Tekin fan, they just seem to always give the power when you needed it. I chose to go with the RS ESC and a 17.5 from pure preference.

Ive been running a 35T with 13tooth pinion on 3S since I got the rig and have had good wheel speed for the outdoor. Indoor I switched to a 45T for torque and less wheel speed reasons. The indoor course Ive been running on is made from foam with brown grout on it for a surface. The 35T gave me a bit to much wheel speed that I would spin the tires to much where as the 45T gave me more torque with less wheel speed allowing the tires to get more traction. Also temps felt better on the 45T after each run then the 35T did.

The first time I ran the indoor course the rig was hands down so much more stable, predictable and stuck any where it went. I took down 2 perfect courses and the top spot for the day. Its a 10 event series and we're allowed to throw 2 out so I did my setup and tire tests early. The second event was the shock oil changes and 2 DNFs ..... the third event I went to this chassis setup and did my tire tests and again 2 DNFs. Well guess we know what 2 events Im trhowing out now lol but I learned all that early.

Ive been running the Rover blues since I got the rig and played with several foam setups but now Ive got something that seems to work great for me. I took some 1/8 scale foam inserts that AKA makes for buggies, Medium firmness, and stuffed them inside of my Acer foams. The Acers have always worked great for me but wanted a bit more firmness like a 2 stage.

Overall with this current setup yesterday I was able to redeem myself ...... perfect score on the first course and walked the second course with a fat 0 taking the top spot again for the day. putting the truck on the shelf and touching nothing, well almost nothing lol. Got my Rover Ex's and throwing them on for the next event.

pics







and some of the course (ignore the Badlands, these were tire testing runs. they did do very well though but not as well as my rovers)




Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 09:20 AM   #46
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

Good story. I had to make a sandwich about halfway down, but I read it all, and I'm pretty sure you spelled everything correctly!

Who's the dork in the last picture?

Going from blue Rovers to pink should be quite a change.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 09:42 AM   #47
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EeePee View Post
Good story. I had to make a sandwich about halfway down, but I read it all, and I'm pretty sure you spelled everything correctly!

Who's the dork in the last picture?

Going from blue Rovers to pink should be quite a change.

Firefox is awesome ..... it tells me when the stupid kicks in and how to correct it

thats my stunt double ....

one of the guys mounted a set and ran them yesterday. i noticed areas i had traction problems he went right up. he said they felt like they bit to much and he couldnt break them loose when he was trying to.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 08:20 PM   #48
RcBros Hobbies
 
RcBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,646
Default

Looking good, wish I had a local crawl spot like that!
RcBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 09:19 AM   #49
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Little Tekin update ......

So been running the 17.5 + RS system for a while now and was curious about two things .... going up in rotor size and playing with the HotWire.

http://www.teamtekin.com/blmotors.html#redlines
Redline Sensored #TT2251 17.5 w/12.5mm Rotor




I was nervous about the rotor size after seeing what the 14mm did to Eepee's cogfest so I went baby steps with the 13mm Torque Rotor




First thing I noticed was a bit of wheel speed loss, I left the gearing the same 13T but no major thing there I had some to spare. Next thing I tried was duplicating the small amount of stall I had prior.

At times I could get a small shutter, cog noise when I would try to climb vertical from a dead stop and level surface. Yes I know the whole sensored shouldnt cog but at some initial throttle I could get it to. With the 13mm torque rotor it was very difficult to get that noise or stall again, it felt as though at initial throttle the motor was more responsive.

The following day was our indoor comp series. Overall the motor felt smoother from on to off throttle, felt closer to a brushed motor then prior times. I cant speak of exact temps but I can say with certainty that temps were better after each run, from just the touchy feely point of checking the motor was much cooler to the touch.

So far very pleased with the 13mm Torque Rotor


I also have gotten myself the Hot Wire setup and will have some input feeling on changes done with that.

Last edited by Robbob; 04-18-2010 at 08:58 PM. Reason: corrected pinion to 13T
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 01:31 PM   #50
MODERATOR™
 
EeePee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 18,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
after seeing what the 14mm did to Eepee's cogfest so I went baby steps with the 13mm Torque Rotor
Probably pretty wise. I tried it a few more times after swapping back to the original rotor in the 13.5, much smoother. Then went to the 21.5 Ballistic with the 14 mm rotor and it was still there, though not quite as much. Then the Goat crapped out and been running brushed ever since. Brushed is just so smooth. But to be conscience about motor temps and killing it during a whole run is somewhat distracting.
EeePee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 07:19 PM   #51
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EeePee View Post
Probably pretty wise. I tried it a few more times after swapping back to the original rotor in the 13.5, much smoother. Then went to the 21.5 Ballistic with the 14 mm rotor and it was still there, though not quite as much. Then the Goat crapped out and been running brushed ever since. Brushed is just so smooth. But to be conscience about motor temps and killing it during a whole run is somewhat distracting.
I was never worried much about comps with motor temps, I know when I practiced I hated having to let the motor cool between packs though. My buddy runs virtually the same setup as me and he cooks his 45T every time but we know its 90% him since I build his motors too and never cooked mine .


So far on the Hot Wire all that I really see beneficial is the motor timing function. The new Vegas software is sweet but theres nothing really for Rock crawling in it, the Turbo boost feature is nice but it'd be like an on/off switch for crawling.

I really need to get a temp gun though when playing around with this thing though. Heres what Ive seen so far on settings.

Drag Brake Off - no need with worms and only brings on unwanted motor heat

Brake Strength - 0 ... worms give you the automatic brakes and no coast

Neutral Width - 5 (lower number more sensitive throttle input higher number more throttle movement needed - old schoolers would call this Deadband setting) I like a touchier trigger from oval racing and found 5 to be good for me.

Reverse Strength - 100%

Voltage cutoff - 3S 9.0v

Voltage Limiter - OFF - sets initial voltage supplied to motor at start up. I found it gave the throttle a feel like using your radio expo would. i could pull full throttle and watch the motor spin up slow to fast, it felt as though there was a delay giving me less control over it. imagine a castle with a real slow and long curve, you pull full throttle and it took a second to reach full throttle. turning it off I felt more in control of what the motor did speed wise.

Motor Type - Brushless forward w/instant reverse

Throttle Profile - 5 most aggressive

Motor Timing - factory it had 12degrees. Ive gone as high as 20 so far but may have been over geared with a 13T on it. a 12T may be good for that much but Ive backed it down to 18degrees for now. adjusting this up did seem to help gain back some of the wheel speed loss from the rotor change. My opinion is this is the only gain from using the Hot Wire.

still gonna play more with gearing and timing to find that happy spot where I gain the speed but dont lose the low end.

Turbo Boost - OFF/0 - you use this to set a start RPM and an end RPM plus an amount of time it stays on for a timing advancement. possibly a benefit for larger designed courses with distance in between gates and on the clock. you could get a boost in between gates but could cause problems when wheel speed is needed at a gate and the boost kicks in. as Tekin says it should only be used for straight aways so use it carefully.


well thats my story for now .... gonna get out and practice some more with the rig this week and play with some more gearing and timing.

the rig is working great still, been placing in the top 5 for the indoor series im in and took the win at our season opener for our outdoor series last week

Actually LCC took 1st and 2nd at our season opener beating out 2 MOA's and another shafty

Last edited by Robbob; 04-18-2010 at 07:21 PM.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 07:27 PM   #52
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Almost forgot to post what I been using for my limiters. I found these from RPM http://www.rpmrcproducts.com/

Various sizes that snap right onto my shock shaft for easier tuning ...... need 2 sets to do a rig


Last edited by Robbob; 04-18-2010 at 09:02 PM.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 07:30 PM   #53
Rock Crawler
 
losiking1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: dartmouth ns
Posts: 894
Default

i use them on my shacksalso!!! they are awesome jk
losiking1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2010, 09:03 PM   #54
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by losiking1 View Post
i use them on my shacksalso!!!

damn Firefox let the stupid slide in .... ment shOcks
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2010, 09:20 PM   #55
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Well been a while since I did a complete rebuild on my rig and was feeling the pain from lack of care.

For a bit I was having a bad time keeping spurs intact on the rig. After 6 spurs I went to a stainless one, that only showed me I had bigger problems when my slipper finally went and found the case full of shavings. My pinion looked like a saw blade and the slipper gear looked like a chew toy. Some how I had worn a grove in the aluminum upper shaft allowing the slipper gear to walk around.
Well got a new top shaft and went with the slipper eliminator

..... first comp back after fixing that was a win

So after the following weeks comp I decided to tear the entire rig apart. First thing I looked at was the diffs since I had DLux's worms in I wanted to see how the original spools looked.

Not good


I cant say its from the the new worms but I know they werent that bad before. So it was new axle cases and spools.

Next was tear the frame sides off and drill some extra upper link holes. I drilled 3 new ones for both the front and rear. My goal is trying to get a bit more bite into the nose. For now I have the front upper links moved to the new holes but still up top. I also bent the stock links and was able to keep my wheel base at 12.5 still using my 1/8'' spacers.

Heres what I have noticed the frame do with some small testing so far with the front links in farther. When I would approach a climb I could see the front of the frame lift up, like the shocks unloading. After moving the links in farther it doesnt seem to be able to lift as much, leaving me to think more weight is gonna stay on the front. On my little break over areas it felt like the front tires wanted to dig down better.

Now I was also on a quest to shed some pounds. My rig in RTR shape weighed in at 7.2lbs . HOLY CRAP!

So on the front I went with a delrin link on the RCBros high steer knuckles. Shaved a little off the factory setup and gave me some clearance.

I also got some Carbon Fiber for a servo plate.


I will say not a big gain over the factory weight 5.6Grams

CF Plate 5.0Grams


But compared to what I was using Aluminum 12.1Grams


I also went from the factory aluminum servo mounts 2.9Grams

to 3Racing mounts 1.4Grams (and moved the servo back a bit)





I also made a new CF battery plate since I still run mine on the rear axle.

Aluminum 11.6Grams

CF Plate 8.7Grams



Another big hit I knew would help was the dig servo. I didnt take any pics to show the weight savings but I do know from the prototypes I made prior to the RCBros one that mine were lighter to begin with.
I cut another out of acrylic matching the RCBros


Another spot I shaved some off was the rear shock mounts. I was able to take the plastic spacer out, use shorter Ti-screws and lose the spacer on the shock end ...... every little bit helps.



The big area I knew held the most weight was my wheels. Running this rig heavy was really a help for me. My rear LCC wheels held 6oz each so I took 2oz out of each. Nothing drastic but a start for now.

After all the changes I was able to bring the rig down to 6.6lbs and (hopefully) help bulletproof it again.

Well one last pic of the rear links bent ..... they do clear the uppers, driveshaft and servo at full articulation with 15mm limiters



Ill post more after some real rock practice on Sunday and let ya know how the link placement helped or hurt.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 04:20 AM   #56
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 1,784
Default

It come up nicely
Hulksta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2010, 12:25 PM   #57
RCC Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Almost forgot to post what I been using for my limiters. I found these from RPM http://www.rpmrcproducts.com/

Various sizes that snap right onto my shock shaft for easier tuning ...... need 2 sets to do a rig

Nice...Going to have to pick me up a pair..
fa1rch1ld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 08:18 PM   #58
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hulksta View Post
It come up nicely
Thanks, you got 2 sexy LCC's yourself

Quote:
Originally Posted by fa1rch1ld View Post
Nice...Going to have to pick me up a pair..
they make tuning so much easier when you get some place or want to practice and test.


just a couple of picks showing the changes to the front end better.

complete shot of the CF servo mount


I also added 1/8'' spacer to the top links, this helped me bring my castor up straight. I feel like it helps the tires stay in full contact when turning.


And the extra set of upper link holes.


I was able to get out on some rocks last weekend at a scale comp. We use the same location for scale and 2.2 and this particular spot gave me trouble in a few spots. I instantly hit the trouble spots for some practice. I tried each area 3 times and every time the rig handled them with ease.

I could feel the weight loss in the climbs and the clearance of the rear links let me get in closer for our two toughest gates. The front though really feels like its biggest gain.
One bonus gate I had the most trouble with, every approach I was able to get my front tires on a ledge but they always seemed to slip. With the links changed it felt like I had more bite, the front tires dug in and pulled the rear right up.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2010, 09:52 PM   #59
RcBros Hobbies
 
RcBro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 4,646
Default

Did you manage to get the weight on your newer acrylic dig mount?
I'll have to weigh our newest dig mount as it should be fairly lighter then the proto you have.

Thank you for the great pics btw!
RcBro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 05:22 AM   #60
Custom Carbon Fiber
 
Robbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut :(
Posts: 4,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RcBro View Post
Did you manage to get the weight on your newer acrylic dig mount?
I'll have to weigh our newest dig mount as it should be fairly lighter then the proto you have.

Thank you for the great pics btw!

Ill grab that tonight for ya.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com