10-27-2016, 11:36 AM | #261 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Italy
Posts: 33
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Another question from italian drivers Is it legal to use a twin hammers chassis for a class 1 build (respecting all other class 1 rules of course)? rules say you need a full leght chassis (frame rails or tub chassis), long at least same lenght as the wheelbase, right? stock twin hammers is a class 3, tub chassis is too short and rear axle isn't covered by chassis...will be legal buy adding to it a part of frame rails in the back (the driver wants to replicate a ford f150 raptor )? or it's better to find a way to add a nother part of tub chassis in the back? or using a full rail chassis combined only with the twin hammers front ifs suspension and diff? any suggestion? what kind of parts are legal to add to a short frame to make it long enough to be legal? what if glueing a plastic/resin part in the back to make the tub chassis longer? Thank you |
Sponsored Links | |
10-28-2016, 10:37 PM | #262 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Ontario
Posts: 295
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Would I get -1 for functional points for the headers I made? Or are they part of the 3d motor points? Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk |
10-28-2016, 11:15 PM | #263 |
Oppan Gangnam Style Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Shingle Springs
Posts: 5,164
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
I'm guessing part of motor. Unless they spew smoke, fire and toxic exhaust that will make my eyes water. |
10-28-2016, 11:27 PM | #264 |
Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
on the flip side... im just speculating but if somebody can claim a non-functional point for simple exhaust tips poking out under a body (like the tamiya hilifts), or stacks coming out of the bed, i could see you convincing tech to give you that point. imho you definitely put the work in to get a non-funtional point for those. but thats just my opinion. |
10-28-2016, 11:33 PM | #265 | |
Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
| |
10-29-2016, 09:31 AM | #266 | |
Oppan Gangnam Style Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Shingle Springs
Posts: 5,164
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
| |
10-30-2016, 01:19 PM | #267 |
RCC Addict Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Way out there!
Posts: 1,465
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Exhaust -1. Right on the SORRCA points. What is there to think about?
|
10-30-2016, 01:36 PM | #268 |
I joined the Band! Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: On a rock
Posts: 331
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
So rock lights don't count as a functional scale item ? or do they? Seeing as how I see them on 1:1 crawlers I think they should count.. Thoughts?
|
10-31-2016, 09:07 AM | #269 | |
Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
also, if you had the old fracture engine with the exhaust manifold detail just machined into the engine block, i could see that not really being the same as a separate component like bolt on headers or exhaust running under the truck. besides, some of us might just like to talk shop or bs a little. | |
11-02-2016, 01:14 AM | #270 | |
RCC Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Central, WA
Posts: 1,176
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
| |
11-19-2016, 01:54 PM | #271 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Italy
Posts: 33
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
How do you consider the new Duratrax Deep Woods / Louise CR 1.9" tires in size? i can't find the size on their website: DuraTrax Performance Tires - Scale/Crawler Tires is anyone already running those tires in sorrca comps? C2 legal or not? |
11-19-2016, 02:46 PM | #272 |
Moderator Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: chicago
Posts: 2,814
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
edit. derp.... c2 is 4.75 so as far as size you should be fine.
Last edited by badhoopty; 11-19-2016 at 04:10 PM. |
11-20-2016, 03:16 AM | #273 |
Newbie Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Italy
Posts: 33
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
is there an official size of that tires anywhere online? couple of other questions btw.... - Honcho bed: can the lower, round part of the bed where usually you carry the spare tire can be considered a 3d cargo area if it's used to carry scale items instead of the tire? - axial bodies rollbar: the rollcage in axial bodies such as dingo, jeep g6 and deadbolt, is considered for scale points only for the first row of seat (-1 plastic) ? what about the rear part of it? since there are no back seats......the rules say you don't need to have them but just the place where they should be, but these are particular modified bodies not scale counterparts of a real stock1/1 truck, and usually you have the fake fuel tank in the back and no seats.... |
11-20-2016, 12:25 PM | #274 |
Rock Crawler Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Grand rapids
Posts: 770
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules |
11-20-2016, 04:22 PM | #275 | |
What could go wrong? Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 474
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
I'm obviously not a part of the rules committee though, so I'd wait for one of them to chime in, but I can't see why it wouldn't be ok. | |
11-24-2016, 11:07 PM | #276 | |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Finland
Posts: 457
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules Quote:
Basically you would get the points for the second row if you cut the body where you would put the seats in. How do I know? I've asked the exact same questions in one of these rule threads. | |
11-25-2016, 09:29 AM | #277 | |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Interior cage or exo-cage: -3 metal, -1 plastic per row of seats or area where seats would be (vehicle doesn't need an interior to get these points). Cage must have down bars and cross bars in front and behind each row. Not available to tubers One of us sees this wrong... the rule is for interior cage or exo cage. It states nothing about haveing to have a space for seats if occupied by something else. Think VW van, 1 row of seats up front with the area behind filled with junk. ie: bicycle, scale engine, trombone.... (scale accessories) If you had a 3 row interior cage or exo you would get the points simce the VW van is a 3 row capable vehicle. Can you please quote where you recieved this info . Quote:
Last edited by hotwheels000; 11-25-2016 at 09:41 AM. | |
11-26-2016, 08:57 AM | #278 |
Quarry Creeper Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Finland
Posts: 457
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Here you go. 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead Only -1 for the Dingo cage unless you modify the interior. |
11-26-2016, 01:43 PM | #279 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: under a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,443
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
Read post 510, 1 row of seats, 2 row cage points. Both the wraith and dingo qualify for 2 row cage points in stock form.
|
11-26-2016, 05:41 PM | #280 |
I wanna be Dave Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
| Re: 2016 Scale Rules
I think we changed the wording last year to give points for multi row cages. You used to have to have seats to get the cage points, but you only need an area that could have seats to get the cage points.
|
2016 Scale Rules - Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2016 MNRCRC Vehicle Rules | dna4engr | Minnesota | 61 | 04-02-2016 06:16 PM |
2016-2017 rules and new ideas discussion | Dezertdirt | WRCCA Information | 174 | 03-22-2016 12:14 PM |
MNRCRC 2016 Rules Discussion Thread | dna4engr | Minnesota | 66 | 11-09-2015 09:50 PM |
| |