the WTH thread is back!

[wings_of_fire]

Cheap action.


Forward the video by 75%

[wings_of_fire]

So this is how children are kidnapped in china

Footage shown after 8:00

[wings_of_fire]

Who is the turd that created such laws?
This is madness.

[BJoe]

well..........................



I'd have used movie footage of Dan Aykroyd's cover from Blues Brothers 2000, but didn't want the thread to get flagged by Google for scantily clad women

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by wings_of_fire

Who is the turd that created such laws?
This is madness.

The short and over-simplified version:

Before women had careers, this was done to keep women from getting completely hosed (and destitute and homeless) if the sole earner decided to kick the wife to the curb for the sole reason that he wanted a new trophy wife.

I'd think someone worth as much as Bezos would have his assets covered pretty thoroughly. They got married before Amazon launched, so I'd find it hard to believe he got her to sign a prenup after Amazon became a cash-cow, though.

[hpiguy]

By definition you can’t sign a prenup postnup.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by hpiguy

By definition you can’t sign a prenup postnup.

Proof reading ftw!

I'm sure you got the gist of what I was saying though. I doubt he got her to sign some sort of settlement doc just in case of divorce.

[JatoTheRipper]

Originally Posted by wings_of_fire

Cheap action.

Forward the video by 75%

I've always wondered how desperate of a scumbag you have to be to steal a few bugs. I mean it looks like that whore is saving up to buy tits, but at least she was caught on camera.

Sadly, she'll get a slap on the wrist. Put her in prison. Teach her a lesson. We don't have harsh punishment in the US.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper

I've always wondered how desperate of a scumbag you have to be to steal a few bugs. I mean it looks like that whore is saving up to buy tits, but at least she was caught on camera.

Sadly, she'll get a slap on the wrist. Put her in prison. Teach her a lesson. We don't have harsh punishment in the US.

The US incarcerates more people per capita than any other nation (to the tune of about 2.3 million people).

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2018.html

[JatoTheRipper]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

The US incarcerates more people per capita than any other nation (to the tune of about 2.3 million people).

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2018.html

Yes, we don't have nearly enough death sentences.

[wings_of_fire]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

The short and over-simplified version:

Before women had careers, this was done to keep women from getting completely hosed (and destitute and homeless) if the sole earner decided to kick the wife to the curb for the sole reason that he wanted a new trophy wife.

I'd think someone worth as much as Bezos would have his assets covered pretty thoroughly. They got married before Amazon launched, so I'd find it hard to believe he got her to sign a prenup after Amazon became a cash-cow, though.

You know if this settlement happens and she takes a huge chunk out of his wealth(by huge I mean even 1%), its going to follow with an avalanche of divorces across America the great. Its going to tickle the minds of a lot of married women and sadly a divorce like this will be glorified by the feminazis.
I am already reading comments on youtube by women saying 'how she packed boxes when Amazon started in their garage and that is why she deserves half of his wealth'.. Really you F****** b****?

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper

Yes, we don't have nearly enough death sentences.

Considering over half the state prison population is in jail for non-violent offenses and 14% of the whole are in for murder, I don't see this as a death penalty issue.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by wings_of_fire

You know if this settlement happens and she takes a huge chunk out of his wealth(by huge I mean even 1%), its going to follow with an avalanche of divorces across America the great. Its going to tickle the minds of a lot of married women and sadly a divorce like this will be glorified by the feminazis.
I am already reading comments on youtube by women saying 'how she packed boxes when Amazon started in their garage and that is why she deserves half of his wealth'.. Really you F****** b****?

Not really. Gold diggers are nothing new.

[JatoTheRipper]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

Considering over half the state prison population is in jail for non-violent offenses and 14% of the whole are in for murder, I don't see this as a death penalty issue.

So are you trying to say non violent criminals shouldn't get prison time?

[wings_of_fire]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

Not really. Gold diggers are nothing new.

Ofcourse they are nothing new, but there is no other fodder like scoring billions in a divorce. Its every gold diggers wet dream.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper

So are you trying to say non violent criminals shouldn't get prison time?

No. You have this weird way of drawing conclusions out of thin air.

If half of the prison population is in for non-violent crime (i.e. theft), then the conclusion is that we do punish people for crimes other than violent ones in this country.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by wings_of_fire

Ofcourse they are nothing new, but there is no other fodder like scoring billions in a divorce. Its every gold diggers wet dream.

Yeah, but this is a massive exception. If Jeff Bezos remarries, do you think he is going to go in without a big-time prenup?

What you are suggesting would be like trying to play the stock market: Gold digger tries to find up and coming rich guy before he is actually wealthy.

Rich guys thinking only with their genitals are the ones that get raked by a gold digger.

[JatoTheRipper]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

No. You have this weird way of drawing conclusions out of thin air.

If half of the prison population is in for non-violent crime (i.e. theft), then the conclusion is that we do punish people for crimes other than violent ones in this country.

It wasn't a conclusion. It was a question. So you just drew a conclusion about my question!

I never said we don't punish people. I said we don't give harsh punishments. I'll stick to that statement.

[skinnyj]

Originally Posted by JatoTheRipper

It wasn't a conclusion. It was a question. So you just drew a conclusion about my question!

I never said we don't punish people. I said we don't give harsh punishments. I'll stick to that statement.

No. We try to give punishments that fit the crimes. It's not perfect, but I'll take it over the crap that passes for "justice" in a lot of the 3rd world sewers.

[JatoTheRipper]

Originally Posted by skinnyj

No. We try to give punishments that fit the crimes. It's not perfect, but I'll take it over the crap that passes for "justice" in a lot of the 3rd world sewers.

If you think our punishments are just all I can do is laugh.