Go Back   RCCrawler Forums > Competitions and Events > Scale Comp Rules
Loading

Notices

Thread: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2014, 03:40 PM   #561
R2j
SORRCA Committee Member
 
R2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Parkston, SD
Posts: 4,523
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by distinctive pd View Post
Hey fellas just curious about notching a 4.2" hole in my drop bed of my C1 build so my spare tire can sit on the frame rails. ... will it be legal and/ or affect points since a good portion of the bed/floor would be gone?

Thanx
dp
Is there a reason why you would want to mount to the frame and not just have a mount in the bed itself? Remember, you get points for having a spare tire mount.
R2j is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-20-2014, 04:16 PM   #562
Rock Crawler
 
distinctive pd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 955
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

I wanted to mount it low as possible as well as utilize the tire mount I would fab into the frame as part of rear shock mount under the bed. ..that is as long as I don't get docked for cutting a big hole back there...
distinctive pd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2014, 09:18 AM   #563
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 01011
Posts: 389
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Morning guys. I'm in the midst of getting things together to fab a class3 rig and have a couple of questions for the experts:

1) I understand that I need to have chassis rails if I choose to go with a tube chassis. If I read the rules correctly they need to be the same length as the wheelbase correct? If I decided on a 12.3" wheelbase than the chassis rails must be the same length? Seeing how I'm kinda asking - what is the max wheelbase that can be run?

And B) could I theoretically have both rear steer and a dig in the same rig ? I understand I can only use 1 at a specific course but if the other was clearly locked out it would still be a legal rig correct?

Appreciate any help and happy holidays!!!
Phins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2014, 09:29 AM   #564
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

1- You do not need chassis rails in Class3 if you build a tuber. The rig can be all tube.
If your WB is 12.3 then your chassis length will have to be 12.3 or more - No max WB. Build as you see fit but remember your gate min widths.

2- You can have both - just like you said, only allowed to use 1 on a course. Most just pick 1 or the other to make it easier.

Hope that helps!
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2014, 05:29 PM   #565
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 01011
Posts: 389
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Thanx doublej!
Phins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2014, 11:00 AM   #566
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: British Crawlumbia, Canada
Posts: 33
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

I'm still in need of clarification on scale points per course. If I have -60 in scale points does that mean for each 10 gate course I get -30 added to my total score?

Thanks for your time guys!
SCRPNBY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2014, 11:04 AM   #567
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCRPNBY View Post
I'm still in need of clarification on scale points per course. If I have -60 in scale points does that mean for each 10 gate course I get -30 added to my total score?

Thanks for your time guys!
Number of gates is up to the event organizer. But if you have -60 scale points then yes you get -30 scale points or 50% of your scale points per course.
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 05:03 PM   #568
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

2.2 Flatiron question.
The tires are marked 4.84". Most web pages that sell them list them at
120mm (4.72"). Unmounted they measure just over 4.25". Mounted on my
Integy beadlocks they measure 4.5".

Legal for class 2? If not, why?





KevenP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 05:39 PM   #569
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevenP View Post
2.2 Flatiron question.
The tires are marked 4.84". Most web pages that sell them list them at
120mm (4.72"). Unmounted they measure just over 4.25". Mounted on my
Integy beadlocks they measure 4.5".
Legal for class 2? If not, why?
Quote:
Tire size will be determined by advertised manufacturer specs (tires without available specs will be measured off the truck as mounted on the wheel laid flat).
So we would go off the specs from Pro-line at:
Height: 4.84" (123mm)

Class2 tires limit is:
Quote:
120mm / 4.75" max tire size with a 2.2 max rim size including spare.
So no sir, not class2 legal because someone decided to list their tires bigger than they actually are.
The reason for using manufacturer specs is to make life easy on the Tech table guys and to keep things simple. Tires can change size a lot from setup to setup, going off specs means you have a set number. Unfortunately there is a tire or two out there that could use their specs updated, it has happened before - Why Pro-line hasn't updated these I have no idea.
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 06:02 PM   #570
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

I know the rule. I was on the SORRCA committee.
However, the tires are mis-marked and the community knows it.

This needs to be addressed. Hopefully a vote can be taken for an amendment.

Thanks.
KevenP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 06:25 PM   #571
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

We have gone over this time and time again but I will bring it up again.
The manufacturers need to fix their listings. They have before.....
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 06:34 PM   #572
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevenP View Post
I know the rule. I was on the SORRCA committee.
However, the tires are mis-marked and the community knows it.

This needs to be addressed. Hopefully a vote can be taken for an amendment.

Thanks.
Hi Keven. Still trying to stir the pot huh? Hope you are doing well. Feel free to stop by a comp some day!
War Pig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 06:34 PM   #573
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Thanks.

I would think it would be easier for a committee to make an amendment rather than ask a company to change their mold.
KevenP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 07:04 PM   #574
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

You have already proven the mild isn't the issue. If they fix the mold to match the specs then the tire would be bigger.....
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 07:09 PM   #575
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,923
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Keven, there are so many options now that 2.2 Flatirons aren't even on the radar. The rule about manufacturer listed size will remain. We don't make amendments for individual instances like this. If we did, there would be dozens of amendments that would just confuse people. Thanks for the input though!
War Pig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2014, 07:09 PM   #576
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

No, I meant change the numbers on the mold to reflect the actual size. Sorry.
KevenP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2014, 12:09 AM   #577
Rock Crawler
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Empire
Posts: 647
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Thanks Tim,
I figured if I posted pics and gave facts there might be a vote for an amendment. Not just a 'no, because we said so'.

The only other tire that I know of having problems with 'stated size' is the Proline TSL?

Last edited by KevenP; 12-25-2014 at 11:45 AM.
KevenP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2014, 12:24 AM   #578
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by doublej View Post
The reason for using manufacturer specs is to make life easy on the Tech table guys and to keep things simple. Tires can change size a lot from setup to setup, going off specs means you have a set number.
Quote:
Originally Posted by doublej View Post
We have gone over this time and time again but I will bring it up again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Pig View Post
If we did, there would be dozens of amendments that would just confuse people.

Nice talk....
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2014, 11:05 AM   #579
Quarry Creeper
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: 01011
Posts: 389
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

Quote:
Originally Posted by doublej View Post
1- You do not need chassis rails in Class3 if you build a tuber. The rig can be all tube.
If your WB is 12.3 then your chassis length will have to be 12.3 or more - No max WB. Build as you see fit but remember your gate min widths.

2- You can have both - just like you said, only allowed to use 1 on a course. Most just pick 1 or the other to make it easier.

Hope that helps!
What about wheelbase for a class2? My thought is if I can pull it off I may do a hybrid that with minimal changes could run either class
Phins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2014, 11:07 AM   #580
I wanna be Dave
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sin City
Posts: 3,628
Default Re: 2014 scale rules discussion or question thead

There is not a wheel base restriction in any class. Only body restriction that go off your wheel base.
As long as you meet that as needed, your fine.
doublej is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



2014 scale rules discussion or question thead - Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 scale rules discussion or question thead War Pig Scale Comp Rules 808 08-15-2014 09:29 PM
2014 Crawling GTG's and (NON-2014 MIRCA) Event Discussion 95geo Michigan 5 02-23-2014 05:06 PM
2014 SORRCA Scale rules doublej Scale Comp Rules 3 01-03-2014 01:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2004-2014 RCCrawler.com